Assessment of the impact of investment in research and development and the number of researchers on economic growth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.5479Keywords:
investment in research and development, number of researchers, economic growth, Granger causality, panel dataAbstract
This research analyzes the impact of investment in Research and Development (R&D) and the number of researchers on the economic growth of some of the economies of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), for the period 1996-2016. A causality analysis in the sense of Granger is performed and a panel data model is estimated. Data are obtained from the World Bank. There is empirical evidence of bidirectional causality between R&D and GDP per capita, but predominantly R&D Granger-causes GDP. Bidirectional causality is also found between the number of researchers and GDP per capita, but predominantly GDP Granger-causes the number of researchers. While the dynamic panel model of the MGM system in one stage shows that economic growth is positively affected by investment in R&D and the number of researchers. This work differs from others in the following aspects: 1) it considers a sample of 25 OECD countries in the period 1996-2016; 2) there is a greater availability of data, and 3) a dynamic panel data analysis is carried out that allows the use of a greater number of countries, variables and periods.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., Akeigit, U., Alp, H., Bloom, N., & Kerr, W. (2018). Innovation reallocation and growth. American Economic Review, 108(11), 3450-91. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130470
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Arellano M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-components Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Arnold, L. (1998). Growth, welfare and trade in an integrated model of human-capital acumulation and research. Journal of Macroeconomics, 20(1), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-0704(98)00048-2
Baltagi, B.H. (2005), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. (3Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Econometric+Analysis+of+Panel+Data%2C+5th+Edition-p-9781118672327
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Bond, S.R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9
Cameron, G., Proudman, J., & Redding, S. (2005). Technolgical convergence, R&D, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review, 49(3), 775-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00070-9
Choi, C., & Hoon, M. (2017). The internet, R&D expenditure and economic growth.
Journal Applied Economics Letters, 25(4), 264-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1316819
Coe, D., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5), 859-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00100-E
Deeds, D. (2001). The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology start-ups. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9183-9
Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Adalı, Z., & Rıdvan Aydın, R. (2019). Evaluating the Role of Research and Development and Technology Investments on Economic Development of E7 Countries. In Alicia Guerra (ed.). Organizational Transformation and Managing Innovation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, 245-264.
Doukas, J., & Switzer, L. (1992). The stock Market’s valuation of R&D spending and market concentration. Journal of Economics and Business, 44(2), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2004.10.007
Durmus, Y., & Korhan, A. (2019). Effects of economic clusters, FDI and R&D on innovation developing countries in European Monetary Union example. International Journal of Innovation, 7(2), 236-251. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji
Đuro, K., Sunčica, S., Svetlana, L., & Sanja, P. (2020), Industrija. Uticaj ulaganja u istraživanje i razvoj na ekonomski rast u Republici Srbiji, 48(1), 23-46.
Granger, C. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
Greene, W. (2012). Econometric Analysis (7ª Ed.). New York: Pearson Education. https://www.academia.edu/37844952/Greene_2012_Econometric_Analysis_7th_Edition
Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/innovation-and-growth-global-economy
Guangzhou, A. (2001). Ownership, government R&D, and productivity in Chinese industry. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1), 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1704
Gujarati, D.N., & Porter, D.C. (2009). Econometría (5ª Ed.). México: McGraw-Hill. https://www.academia.edu/15152239/Econometria_-_Damodar_N._Gujarati
Jones, C. (1995). R&D-based models economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0800000026
Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Nekrep, A., Strašek , S., & Boršič, D. (2018). Productivity and Economic Growth in the European Union: Impact of Investment in Research and Development, Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, 64(1), 18-27.
Pessoa, A. (2010). R&D and economic growth: How strong is the link? Economics Letters, 107(2), 152-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.01.010
Rajeev, K., Payne, J., & Rati, R. (2008). R&D expenditures and U.S. economic growth: a disaggregated approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(2), 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.04.008
Rebelo, S. (1991). Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 500-521.
Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. https://doi. org/10.1086/261420
Shefer, D., & Frenkel, A. (2005). R&D firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis. Technovation, 25(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00152-4
Schumpeter, J.A. (1911). Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker und Humblot.
Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics Review, 70(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
Teubal, M. (1996). R&D and technology policy in NICs as learning processes. World Development, 24(3), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00156-7
Thompson, M. (2018). Social capital, innovation and economic growth. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 73, 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.01.005
Wakelin, K. (2001). Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 30(7), 1079-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00136-0
Wooldridge, J. (2011). Introducción a la econometría. Un enfoque moderno (4th. Ed.). México: Cengage Learning. https://www.academia.edu/30200962/Introducci%C3%B3n_A_La_Econometr%C3%ADa_-_4edi_Wooldridge
World Development Indicators (2019). The World Bank, Washington, DC. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alí Aali-Bujari , Francisco Venegas-Martínez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of manuscripts implies that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and that, in case of acceptance, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the Journal for its publication and dissemination. Authors retain the authors' right to use and share the article according to a personal or instutional use or scholarly sharing purposes; in addition, they retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
All the articles are published in the Journal under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA (Attribution-ShareAlike). It is allowed a commercial use of the work (always including the author attribution) and other derivative works, which must be released under the same license as the original work.
Up to Volume 21, this Journal has been licensing the articles under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 3.0 ES. Starting from Volume 22, the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0 is used.