Which Countries Pay More or Less For Their Long Term Debt? A CART Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.2255Keywords:
Long-term yields, sovereign yields, classification trees, decision trees, tipos a largo plazo, rendimientos soberanos, árboles de clasificación, árboles de decisiónAbstract
The objective of this paper is to classify a group of EMU countries according to the main determinants of long-term sovereign bond yields. We apply the Classication and Regression Tree method (CART). According to the findings, countries with lower inflation, a lower debt to GDP ratio, a lower average income tax rate, higher public debt maturity and higher IPI growth are placed in classification groups that have lower bond yields. These results confirm the hypothesis that countries with better macroeconomic and fiscal indicators have lower sovereign bond yields.
Downloads
References
Rault, C. and Afonso, A. (2011). “Long-run determinants of sovereign yields”, Economic Bulletin, 31(1); 367-374.
Afonso, A.; Gomes, P. and Rother, P. (2011). “Short- and long-run determinants of sovereign credit ratings”, International Journal of Finance and Economics, 16(1); 15.
Ardagna, S.; Caselli, F. and Lane, T. (2007). “Fiscal discipline and the cost of public debt service: Some estimates for OECD countries”, The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 7(1); 1-28.
Bernoth, K. and Erdogan, B. (2012). “Sovereign bond yield spreads: A time-varying coefficient approach”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(3); 639-656.
Breiman, L.; Friedman, J.; Olshen, R. and Stone, C. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall.
Caporale, G.M. and Williams, G. (2002). “Long-term nominal interest rates and domestic fundamentals”, Review of Financial Economics, 11(2); 119-130.
Gruber, J. W. and Kamin, S.B. (2012). “Fiscal positions and government bond yields in OECD countries”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(8); 1563-1587.
Hardouvelis, G.A. (1988). “Economic news, exchange rates and internal rates”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 7(1); 23-35.
Hodgson, A.; Kremmer, M.L. and Shane, L. (1998). “Endogeneous Sovereign bond yield spreads: A time-varying coefficient approach”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(3); 639-656.
Kiani, K.M. (2009). “Federal budget deficits and long-term interest rates in USA”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(1); 74-84.
Laubach, T. (2009). “New evidence on the interest rate effects of budget deficits and debt”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(4); 858-885.
Maltritz, D. (2012). “Determinants of sovereign yield spreads in the Eurozone: A Bayesian approach”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(3); 657-672.
Manasse, P. and Roubini, N. (2009). “Rules of "thumb" for sovereign debt crises”, Journal of International Economics, 78(2); 192-205.
Morrison, J. (1998). “Introducing CART to the forecasting process”, The Journal of Business Forecasting Methods & Systems, 17(1); 9-12.
Oral, M.; Kettani, O.; Cosset, J.C. and Daouas, M. (1992). “An estimation model for country risk rating”, International Journal of Forecasting, 8(4); 583-593.
Poghosyan, T. (2012). “Long-run and short-run determinants of sovereign bond yields in advanced economies”, IMF Working Papers, 271.
Remolona, E.; Scatigna, M. and Wu, E. (2007). “Interpreting sovereign spreads”, BIS Quarterly Review, March; 27-39.
Schuknecht, L.; Von Hagen, J. and Wolswijk, G. (2009). “Government risk premiums in the bond market: EMU and Canada”, European Journal of Political Economy, 25(3); 371-384.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of manuscripts implies that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and that, in case of acceptance, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the Journal for its publication and dissemination. Authors retain the authors' right to use and share the article according to a personal or instutional use or scholarly sharing purposes; in addition, they retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
All the articles are published in the Journal under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA (Attribution-ShareAlike). It is allowed a commercial use of the work (always including the author attribution) and other derivative works, which must be released under the same license as the original work.
Up to Volume 21, this Journal has been licensing the articles under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 3.0 ES. Starting from Volume 22, the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0 is used.