A bibliometric analysis of brand equity 1991 - 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.3298Keywords:
bibliometrics, brand equity, scientific productivity, scientific cooperationAbstract
This document provides a bibliometric analysis of the current state of the brand equity research by mapping the research landscape to identify more productive authors and countries over time, analysis of publications, cooperation between authors, co-appointments, co-occurrences of keywords; plus, identification of research clusters to visualize the conceptual structure of the field of knowledge. Using the Scopus collection, this study analyzes 2000 publications that study brand equity. Identify four major research groups: brand equity, empirical analysis, the services sector and the common methodology of the studies, which characterize the different research trends and analyze the most preponderant fields of action for the understanding of brand equity; new studies are proposed that include a traditional systematic review to complement what is stated in this document. This research provides an overview that can be a valuable guide for teachers, researchers and professionals.
Downloads
References
Aaker, D. (1991). Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York, 28, 35-37.
Aaker, D. (1992). The value of brand equity. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), 27-32.
Álvarez, E. C., & Anegón, F. D. M. (2009). Chemistry in Spain: Bibliometric analysis through scopus. Chimica Oggi, 27(6), 61-64.
Andrlic, B., Idlbek, R., & Budic, H. (2007). Marketing strategy in creating of brand equity on internet. Annals of DAAAM & Proceedings, 19-21.
Anselmsson, J., Burt, S., & Tunca, B. (2017). An integrated retailer image and brand equity framework: Re-examining, extending, and restructuring retailer brand equity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 194-203.
Arencibia, J., & Carvajal, R. (2008). Los índices H, G y R: su uso para identificar autores líderes en el área de la comunicación durante el período 2001-2006. ACIMED: Revista Cubana de los Profesionales de la Información y la Comunicación en Salud, 17(4), 1-9.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
Augusto, M., & Torres, P. (2018). Effects of brand attitude and eWOM on consumers’ willingness to pay in the banking industry: mediating role of consumer-brand identification and brand equity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 1-10.
Baalbaki, S., & Guzmán, F. (2016). A consumer-perceived consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Brand Management, 23(3), 229-251.
Bazm, S., Kalantar, S. M., & Mirzaei, M. (2016). Bibliometric mapping and clustering analysis of iranian papers on reproductive medicine in scopus database (2010-2014). International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine, 14(6), 371-382.
Bouazza, H., & Habacha, A. (2013). Customer-based brand equity: A controversial issue. In: Vision 2020: Innovation, Development Sustainability, and Economic Growth - Proceedings of the 21st International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA (Vol. 2, pp. 30–41). International Business Information Management Association.
Charles, V., & Zavala, J. J. (2017). A satisficing DEA model to measure the customer-based brand equity. RAIRO - Operations Research, 51(3), 547-566.
Chattopadhyay, A. & Alba, J.W. (1988). The situational importance of recall and inference in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(1), 1-12.
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M.B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2013). Twenty years of research on performance management in business and public administration domains. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2013, No. 1, p. 14270). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
Davcik, N.S., Vinhas da Silva, R., & Hair, J.F. (2015). Towards a unified theory of brand equity: Conceptualizations, taxonomy and avenues for future research. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(1), 3-17.
Fetscherin, M., & Heinrich, D. (2015). Consumer brand relationships research: A bibliometric citation meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 380-390.
Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research 257-276. Springer.
Gómez-Suárez, M., Quinones, M., & Yagúe, M. J. (2016). Store brand evaluative process in an international context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(7), 754-771.
Greenacre, M. (2017). Correspondence analysis in practice, third edition. (pp. 1-310). CRC Press.
Guan, H., & Ma, J. (2009). The impact of customer-based E-tail brand equity on web-market outcomes. In Proceedings - International Conference on Networks Security, Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing, NSWCTC 2009 (Vol. 2, pp. 270-273).
Gurzki, H., & Woisetschlaeger, D.M. (2017). Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 77, 147-166.
Han, H., & Hyun, S.S. (2018). Role of motivations for luxury cruise traveling, satisfaction, and involvement in building traveler loyalty. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 70, 75-84.
Heinberg, M., Ozkaya, H. E., & Taube, M. (2018). Do corporate image and reputation drive brand equity in India and China? - Similarities and differences. Journal of Business Research, 86, 259-268.
Hoyos, R. (2016). Branding: el arte de marcar corazones. Bogotá: Ecoe Ediciones.
Huamaní, C., Rey de Castro, J., González-Alcaide, G., Polesel, D. N., Tufik, S., & Andersen, M. L. (2015). Scientific research in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Bibliometric analysis in SCOPUS, 1991 - 2012. Sleep and Breathing, 19(1), 109-114.
Huamaní, C., Romaní, F., González-Alcaide, G., Mejia, M. O., Ramos, J. M., Espinoza, M., & Cabezas, C. (2014). South American collaboration in scientific publications on leishmaniasis: Bibliometric analysis in Scopus (2000-2011). Revista do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De Sao Paulo, 56(5), 381-390.
Huang, Y., & Shih, K. (2017). Customer-based brand equity of smartphone in the emerging market. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 15(5), 467-490.
Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2017). National ties of international scientific collaboration and researcher mobility found in nature and science. Scientometrics, 110(2), 673-694.
Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
Keller, K.L. (2001). Building Customer-Based Brand Equity: A Blueprint for Creating Strong Brands. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2-3), 139-155.
Kumar, S., & Kumar, S. (2008). Collaboration in Research Productivity in Oil Seed Research Institutes of India. Fourth International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Ninth COLLNET Meeting Humboldt- Universitat Zu Berlin, Institute for Library and Information Science (IBI), 1-18.
Kwon, K., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the triple helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163-176.
Li-xin, Z., & Shou-lian, T. (2010). Research on Influencing Mechanism of Customer-Based Brand Equity of Service Enterprise. International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (pp. 4406–4409).
Londoño, W., & Castañeda, L. (2018). Análisis Bibliométrico de tendencias en marca. Revista Espacios, 39(14), 23-38.
Loureiro, S., & Correia, M. (2013). The effect of perceived benefits, trust, quality, brand awareness/associations and brand loyalty on internet banking brand equity. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 4(2), 139-158.
Luo, Z., & Wei, H. (2011). An empirical study on the formation mechanism of internet brand equity. In 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce, AIMSEC - Proceedings (pp. 109–112).
Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2016). The counting house: Measuring those who count. Presence of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and altmetrics in the Google Scholar citations, Researcherid, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02412.
Moncayo, S. (2018). Relación de los constructos que definen el brand equity desde un enfoque formativo de la marca YAMAHA en personas de 18 a 70 años en la ciudad de Bogotá (Tesis de grado). Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombia.
Murtagh, F. (2007). Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods. Psychometrika, 72(2), 275-277.
Oh, H., Fiore, A. M., & Jeoung, M. (2007). Measuring experience economy concepts: Tourism applications. Journal of Travel Research, 46(2), 119-132.
Price, D.S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 27(5), 292-306.
Rajh, E. (2001). The relationship between sources of brand equity and market outcomes; Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 14(2), 77-82.
Sánchez, A.D., de la Cruz Del Río Rama, M., & García, J.Á. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 8-15.
Syed , S.F., Nguyen, B., Melewar, T.C., Loh, Y.H., & Liu, M. (2016). Explicating industrial brand equity: Integrating brand trust, brand performance and industrial brand image. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(5), 858-882.
Urbizagástegui, R., & Restrepo, C. (2011). Modelando la distribución del número de co–autores por artículo. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 25(53), 103-119.
Urbizagástegui-Alvarado, R. (2014). Estudio sincrónico de obsolescencia de la literatura: El caso de la Ley de Lotka. Investigación Bibliotecnológica, 28(63), 85-113.
Vaijayanthi, P., & Shreenivasan, Ka. (2017) Measuring brand equity of cosmeceuticals †a case using consumer based brand equity model. Asian Journal of pharmaceutical and clinical research, 10(6), 210-215.
Xiaoping, F., Xiaojing, T., & Sijun, X. (2012). A study on the operation mechanism of website brand equity based on S-O-R paradigm. In 9th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management - Proceedings of ICSSSM’12 (pp. 566-569).
Zhou, Q., Xu, Y., Yin, Z., Bao, D., & Wang, S. (2014). Brand equity management for luxury food products based on the customer service strategy. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 6(12), 1356-1361.
Zhu, D.S., & Kuo, M.J. (2010). A study on the customer-based brand equity of online retailers. In Proceedings - 9th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science, ICIS 2010 (pp. 295-300).
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of manuscripts implies that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and that, in case of acceptance, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the Journal for its publication and dissemination. Authors retain the authors' right to use and share the article according to a personal or instutional use or scholarly sharing purposes; in addition, they retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
All the articles are published in the Journal under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA (Attribution-ShareAlike). It is allowed a commercial use of the work (always including the author attribution) and other derivative works, which must be released under the same license as the original work.
Up to Volume 21, this Journal has been licensing the articles under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 3.0 ES. Starting from Volume 22, the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0 is used.
