Austrian economic cycle theory applied to the Spanish case: from the begging of the euro to the great recession and its recovery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.6837Keywords:
economic and business cycle, monetary policy, capital-based Macroeconomics, Austrian Economics, Heterodox approachesAbstract
This is a research on Political Economy, Macroeconomics and Applied Economy, based on the Austrian Economics´ approach over the economic cycles and applied to the Spanish case (2002-2014). Attention is focused on the endemic problem of economic cycles, such as successive and distorting periods of boom and recession that modern economies suffer, such as the Spanish economy. This is an inquire to find empirical evidence in favor of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory, for the specific Spanish case between 2002 and 2014, through the application of econometric methods. Consequently, after reviewing the scarce previous econometric literature on the Austrian cycle, this research has as its main objective to explain and illustrate the boom with the effective introduction of the euro in 2002, the recession during 2008-11 and the recovery in 2014, using the Austrian theory of the endogenous and non-neutral monetary cycle.
Downloads
References
Almon, S. (1965). The distributed lag between capital appropriations and expenditures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 33(1), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911894
Alonso, M.A. (2004). Una guía para el estudio de la Macroeconomía del Capital: ¿Existen razones para pensar que los ciclos recesivos responden a errores políticos y empresariales? Procesos de mercado, 1(1), 113-186.
Alonso, M.A. (2005). Las teorías monetarias del ciclo en el marco de la literatura sobre ciclos económicos. Revista Libertas, 13(43), 1-28.
Alonso, M.A., Bagus, P., & Rallo, J.R. (2011). La crisis subprime a la luz de la teoría austriaca del ciclo económico: Expansión crediticia, errores de decisión y riesgo moral. Revista de Economía Mundial, 28, 145-174.
Alonso, M.A., Bagus, P., & Romero-Ania, A. (2013). Una ilustración empírica de la teoría austriaca del ciclo económico: el caso de Estados Unidos, 1988-2010. Investigación económica, 72(285), 41-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1667(13)72596-7
Arnedo, E.G., Valero-Matas, J.A., & Sánchez-Bayón, A. (2021). Spanish tourist sector sustainability: Recovery plan, green jobs and wellbeing opportunity. Sustainability, 13(20), 11447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011447
Bismans, F., Mougeot, C. (2009). Austrian business cycle theory: Empirical evidence. The Review of Austrian Economics, 22(3), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-009-0084-6
Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1884). Geschichie und Kritik der Kapitalzins-Theorieen. Innsbruck: Wagner'schen Universitäts-Buchhandlung.
Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1888). Positive Theorie des Capitals. Innsbruck: Wagner'schen Universitäts-Buchhandlung.
Cachanosky, N., Padilla, A. (2016). A Mathematical Version of Garrison's Model. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 19(3), 225-247.
Cachanosky, N. (2017). Secular Growth in Garrison's Model: A Comment. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 40(5), 354-359.
Callahan, G., Garrison, R. (2003). Does Austrian business cycle theory help explain the dot-com boom and bust? The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 6(2), 67-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-003-1019-x
Carilli, A., Dempster, G. (2008). Is the Austrian business cycle theory still relevant? The Review of Austrian Economics, 21(4), 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-008-0044-6
Ebeling, R. (2001). Austrian Macroeconomics: Review of Time and Money. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Macroeconomics, 4(3), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185243
Engelhardt , L. (2009). Comment on 'A Capital-Based Theory of Economic Growth'. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 12(2), 60-62.
Fisher, E.A. (2013). Monetary policy and capital-based macroeconomics: an empirical examination for the United States (1963-2012). Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 16(1), 45-74.
Friedman, M., Schwartz, A. (2008). A monetary history of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829330
Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. The American Economic Review, 58(1), 1-17.
Friedman , M. (1993). The "plucking model" of business fluctuations revisited. Economic Inquiry 31(2), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00874.x
Froyen, R.T. (1997). Macroeconomía. Teoría y Políticas. México: Prentice Hall Hispanoamericana.
García-Vaquero, M., Sánchez-Bayón, A., & Lominchar, J. (2021). European Green Deal and Recovery Plan: Green Jobs, Skills and Wellbeing Economics in Spain. Energies, 14(14), 4145. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144145
Garrison, R. (1978). Austrian macroeconomics: A diagrammatical exposition. Menlo Park: Institute for Humane Studies.
Garrison, R. (1989). The Austrian theory of the business cycle in the light of modern macroeconomics. The Review of Austrian Economics, 3(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539555
Garrison, R. (2006). Natural and neutral rates of interest in theory and policy formulation. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 9(4), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-006-1024-y
Garrison, R. (2001). Time and Money. The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203208083
Granger, C. (1969). Investigating Causal Relation by Econometric and Cross-sectional Method. Econometrica, 37, 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
Hayek, F. (1929). Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle. London: University of London.
Hayek, F. (1931). Prices and production. London: Routledge.
Hayek, F. (1941). The Pure Theory of Capital. London: Macmillan.
Hodrick, R., Prescott, E. (1997). Postwar US business cycles: an empirical investigation. Journal of Money, credit, and Banking, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953682
Huerta de Soto, J. (1998). Dinero, Crédito Bancario y Ciclos Económicos. Madrid: Unión Editorial.
Huerta de Soto, J. (2009). The Theory of the dynamic efficiency. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930601
Hülsmann, J.G. (2001). Garrisonian macroeconomics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 4(3), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185243
Hutchison, T. (1956). Professor Machlup on Verification in Economics. Southern Economic Journal, 17, 476-83. https://doi.org/10.2307/1054536
Keeler, J. (2001). Empirical evidence on the Austrian business cycle theory. The Review of Austrian Economics, 14(4), 331-351. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011937230775
Le Roux, P., Levin, M. (1998). The capital structure and the business cycle: some tests of validity of the Austrian business cycle in South Africa. Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 22(3), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03796205.1998.12129132
Lester, R.B., Wolff, J.S. (2013). The empirical relevance of the Mises-Hayek theory of the trade cycle. The Review of Austrian Economics, 26(4), 433-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-013-0225-9
Lucas, R. (1972). Expectations and the Neutrality of Money. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1
Luther, W., Cohen, M. (2014). An empirical analysis of the Austrian business cycle theory. Atlantic Economic Journal, 42(2), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-014-9415-5
Machlup, F. (1931). The Stock Market, Credit and Capital Formation. London: Hodge.
Machlup, F. (1936). Why Bother with Methodology? Economica, 3(9), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549168
Menger, C. (1883). Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften, und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Leipzig: Verlag.
Mises, L. (1912). Theorie des Geldes und der Umlaufsmittel. Leipzig: Verlag.
Mises, L. (1949). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
Mulligan, R. (2002). A Hayekian analysis of the term structure of production. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(2), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-002-1010-y
Mulligan, R. (2006). An empirical examination of Austrian business cycle theory. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 9(2), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-006-1009-x
Murphy, R. (2017). Is Garrison's notion of "secular growth" compatible with the Solow growth literature? Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 20(4), 336-353.
Powell, B. (2002). Explaining Japan's recession. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(2), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-002-1011-x
Ravier, A., Cachanosky, N. (2015). Fiscal Policy in Capital-Based Macroeconomics with Idle Resources. Journal of Private Enterprise, 30(4), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2487615
Rothbard, M. (1957). In Defense of "Extreme Apriorism". Southern Economic Journal, 18, 314-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1054221
Rothbard, M. (1963). America's Great Depression. New York: Van Nostrand.
Rothbard, M. (1993). Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Salerno, J. (2001). Does the concept of secular growth have a place in capital-based macroeconomics? Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 4(3), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185244
Sánchez-Bayón, A. (2020). Renovación del pensamiento económico-empresarial tras la globalización. Bajo Palabra, 24, 293-318. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp.2020.24.015
Sánchez-Bayón, A. (2021). Balance de la economía digital ante la singularidad tecnológica: cambios en el bienestar laboral y la cultura empresarial. Sociología y Tecnociencia, 11(2). 53-80. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.Extra_2.2021.53-80
Sánchez-Bayón, A. (2022a). ¿Crisis económica o economía en crisis? Relaciones ortodoxia-heterodoxia en la transición digital. Rev. Semestre Económico, 11(1), 54-73. https://doi.org/10.26867/se.2022.v11i1.128
Sánchez-Bayón, A. (2022b). From Neoclassical synthesis to Heterodox synthesis in the digital economy. Procesos de Mercado, 19(2), 277-306. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v19i2.818
Sánchez-Bayón, A., González-Arnedo, E., & Andreu-Escario, A. (2022). Spanish Healthcare Sector Management in the COVID-19 Crisis Under the Perspective of Austrian Economics and New-Institutional Economics. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 801525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.801525
Sánchez-Bayón, A., & Castro-Oliva. M. (2022). Historia de la reciente deflación del capital y los salarios en España. Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 9(2), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.5209/ijhe.82760
Sánchez-Bayón, A., & Castro-Oliva, M. (2023). Gestión heterodoxa de crisis económicas periódicas: Desarrollos de la teoría austriaca del ciclo y del capital. Economía & Negocios, 5(1), 19-51. https://doi.org/10.33326/27086062.2023.1.1594
Selgin, G., Beckworth, D., & Bahadir, B. (2015). The productivity gap: Monetary policy, the subprime boom, and the post-2001 productivity surge. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(2), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.02.005
Wainhouse, C. (1984). Empirical Evidence for Hayek's Theory of Economic Fluctuations. In Money in Siegel, B. (ed.). Crisis: The Federal Reserve, the Economy, and Monetary Reform. San Francisco: Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research, pp. 37-71.
Wicksell, K. (1898). Geldzins und Güterpreise. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Young, A. (2005). Reallocating labor to initiate changes in capital structures: Hayek revisited. Economics letters 89(3), 275-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.05.033
Young, A. (2009a). A capital-based theory of secular growth. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 12(1), 36-51.
Young, A. (2009b). A Capital-Based Theory of Secular Growth: Reply to Engelhardt. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 12(2), 63-67.
Young, A. (2011). The time structure of production in the US, 2002-2009. The Review of Austrian Economics, 25(2), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-011-0158-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Miguel A. Alonso-Neira, Antonio Sánchez-Bayón, Marcos Castro-Oliva
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of manuscripts implies that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and that, in case of acceptance, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the Journal for its publication and dissemination. Authors retain the authors' right to use and share the article according to a personal or instutional use or scholarly sharing purposes; in addition, they retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
All the articles are published in the Journal under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA (Attribution-ShareAlike). It is allowed a commercial use of the work (always including the author attribution) and other derivative works, which must be released under the same license as the original work.
Up to Volume 21, this Journal has been licensing the articles under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 3.0 ES. Starting from Volume 22, the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0 is used.