Efecto de las barreras de innovación en la capacidad de absorción de las empresas innovadoras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.2940Palabras clave:
capacidad de absorción, barreras a la innovación, modelos de regresión, empresas innovadorasResumen
El presente trabajo estudia la importancia de la capacidad de absorción de las empresas innovadoras y el efecto que en ella ejercen las barreras de innovación. Se revisa además la gestión de inversión en capacidad de absorción como promotor de innovación y se exponen las implicaciones al nivel de desempeño de las empresas en cuestiones de procesos y posición en el mercado. Se realiza el análisis mediante modelos de regresión lineal simple y múltiple. Finalmente, el impacto de la innovación en las empresas se obtuvo mediante un análisis de componentes principales.
Descargas
Citas
Açıkdilli, G., & Yaşar, D. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation in the new product development. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(11), 145-150.
Ahmed, P. K., & Shepherd, C. D. (2012). Administración de la Innovación. México: Pearson Editorial.
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220.
Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., & Chiva, R. (2005). Propuesta y validación de una escala de medida del desempeño innovador de la empresa. Documento presentado en el Congreso Nacional de la ACEDE. La Laguna, España.
Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., & Chiva, R. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 333-346.
Alegre, J., Pla-Barber, J., Chiva, R., & Villar, C. (2012). Organisational learning capability, product innovation performance and export intensity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(5), 511-526.
Anderson, N., De Dreu, C., & Nijstad, B. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173.
Arias-Pérez, J., Schafer-Elejalde, G., & Aristizábal-Botero, C. (2014). Relación entre desempeño innovador y madurez de capacidades de conocimiento y competencia. Entramado, 10(1), 82-95.
Arundel, A. (1997). Enterprise strategies and barriers to innovation. Innovation Measurement and Policies, 50, 101-108.
Assink, M. (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 215-233.
Backmann, J., Hoegl, M., & Cordery, J. L. (2015). Soaking It Up: Absorptive Capacity in Interorganizational New Product Development Teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 861-877.
Banco Mundial (2014). Databank. Recuperado de https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?locations=EC-1W&name_desc=false
Barney, J., Della, V., Sciarelli, M., & Arikan, A. (2012). The role of resource-based theory in strategic management studies: Managerial implications and hints for research. En G. Battista, Handbook of research on competitive strategy (págs. 109-146). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8-9), 1237-1263.
Blanchard, P., Huiban, J.-P., Musolesi, A., & Sevestre, P. (2012). Where there is a will, there is a way? Assessing the impact of obstacles to innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(3), 679-710.
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1351-1408.
Camison, C., & Villar-López, A. (2012). On how firms located in an industrial district profit from knowledge spillovers: Adoption of an organic structure and innovation capabilities. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 361-382.
Casillas, J., Moreno, A., Acebo, F., Gallego, M., & Ramos, E. (2009). An integrative model of the role of knowledge in the internationalization process. Journal of World Business, 44(3), 311-322.
Castañeda, D. (2015). Condiciones para el aprendizaje organizacional. Estudios Gerenciales, 31(134), 62-67.
Catozzella, V. (2014). The catalysing role of in-house R&D in fostering complementarity among innovative inputs. Industry and Innovation, 21(3), 179-96.
CEPAL (2016). Ciencia, tecnología e innovación en la economía digital. Segunda Reunión de la Conferencia de Ciencia, Innovación y TIC de la CEPAL (pp. 19-22). San José.
Cepeda-Carrión, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., & Jiménez-Jiménez, D. (2012). The effect of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: Context and information systems capability as catalysts. British Journal of Management, 23(1), 110-129.
Chan, L.K., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures . The Journal of Finance, 56, 2431-2456.
Chang, D.R., & Chob, H. (2008). Organizational memory influences new product success. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 13-23.
Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M.-J. J., & Chang, C.-H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2), 152-158.
Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Chiva, R., & Alegre, J. (2005). Organizational learning and organizational knowledge toward the integration of two approaches. Management Learning, 31(6), 49-68.
CIA. (26 de 06 de 2019). Central Inteligence Agency. Recuperado de The World Factbook: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ec.html
Cockburn, I.M., & Henderson, R.M. (2003). Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182.
Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrafive Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596.
Czarnitzki, D., & Kraft, K. (2004). Control Management and Innovative Activity. Review of Industrial Organization, 24(1), 1-24.
D´Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2012). What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Research Policy, 41(2), 482-488.
Damanpour, F., Szabat, K., & Evan, W. (1989). The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 26(6), 587-601.
Del Carpio, J.F., & Miralles, F. (2018). Absorptive capacity and innovation in low-tech companies in emerging economies. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 13(2), 3-11.
De-Oliveira, F., & Rodil-Marzábal, Ó. (2019). Structural characteristics and organizational determinants as obstacles to innovation in small developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140(C), 306-314.
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dinamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10), 1105-1121.
Fernald, K.D., Pennings, H.P., Van den Bosch, J.F., Commandeur, H.R., & Claassen, E. (2017). The moderating role of absorptive capacity and the differential effects of acquisitions and alliances on Big Pharma firms’ innovation performance. PLOS ONE, 12(2), 1-22.
Fernandes, A., Lourenço, L., & Silva, M. (2014). Influence of Quality Management on the Innovative Performance. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 16(53), 575-593.
Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2013). Innovación Inversa. Bogotá: Carvajal Educación S.A.S.
Guerra, F.J., & Martin-Montaner, J.A. (2017). Desarrollo Histórico de la Industria Manufacturera Ecuatoriana y su matriz de exportación. Revista Publicando, 4(2), 504-521.
Hagedoorn, W. N. (2012). Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies? Research Policy, 41(6), 1072-1083.
Hall, J., & Martin, M. (2005). Disruptive technologies, stakeholders and the innovation value-added chain: a framework for evaluating radical technology development . R&D Management , 35(3), 273-284.
Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1996). Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND Journal of Economics, 27, 32-59.
Holzl, W., & Janger, J. (2013). Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80, 1450-1468.
Hubbard, R.G. (1998). Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 193-225.
Jeon, J., Hong, S., Ohm, J., & Yang, T. (2015). Causal Relationships among Technology Acquisition, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry. PLoS ONE, 10(7), 1-14.
Kamien, M., & Schwartz, N. (1982). Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keller, W. (1996). Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development. Journal of Developmental Economics, 49, 199-210.
Kim, D. (1997). From imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea´s technological learning. Harvard Business School Press.
Koçoglu, I., Akgün, A.E., & Keskin, H. (2015). The differential relationship between absorptive capacity and product innovativeness: a theoretically derived framework. International Business Research, 8(7), 108-120.
Lane, P.J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-477.
Lane, P. J., Koka, B.R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-863.
Lee, Y., Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2011). The impact of service R&D on the performance of Korean information communication technology small and medium enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(1), 77-92.
Leiponen, A. (2005). Skills and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5-6), 303-323.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 822-846.
Lin, C., Wu, Y.-J., Chang, C., Wang, W., & Lee, C.-Y. (2012). The alliance innovation performance of R&D alliances: the absorptive capacity perspective. Technovation, 32(5), 282-292.
Lin, J., & Cao, J. (2008). Study on the knowledge-sharing mechanism of knowledge management of cluster enterprises. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 4, 161-164.
Liu, X., & White, R.S. (1997). The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries. Technovation, 17, 119-125.
Luengo-Valderrey, M.J., & Moso-Díez, M. (2019). Interaction Between Knowledge Management Activities, Innovation Barriers and Innovation Performance: Spanish High and Medium Technology Firms. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(1), 298-317.
Madrid-Guijarro, A., García, D., & Van Auken, H. (2009). Barriers to Innovation among Spanish Manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 465-488.
Mancusi, M.L., & Vezzulli, A. (2014). R&D and Credit rationing in SMEs. Economic Inquiry, 52(3), 1153-1172.
Mirow, C., Hoelzle, K., & Gemuenden, H. (2008). The ambidextrous organization in practice: barriers to innovation within research and development. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1-6.
Mirow, C., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. (2007). Systematisierung, Erklärungsbeitrage und Effekte von Innovations barrieren . Journal für Betriebswirtschaft , 57(2), 101-134.
Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E., & Silverman, B.S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77-91.
Mowery, D., & Oxley, J. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1, 67-93.
Neely, A., & Hii, J. (1998). Innovation and business performance: a literature review. The Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, 1-57.
O’Brian, R. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673-690.
OECD (2005a). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. En Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD (2005b). Manual de Oslo: Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación. Oslo, Noruega: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Oh, J.-M. (2017). Absorptive capacity, technology spillovers, and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 85, 146-164.
Oltra, M.J., & Flor, M. (2003). The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Innovative Capabilities on Firms’ Output Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management , 12(3), 137-144.
Palacios-Marqués, D., Soto-Acosta, P., & Merigó, J.M. (2015). Online social networks as an enabler of innovation in organizations. Management Decision, 53(9), 1906-1920.
Paula, F., & Silva, J. (2018). The impact of alliances and internal R&D on the firm’s innovation and financial performance . Brazilian Business Review, 15, 533-550.
Pellegrino, G., & Savona, M. (2017). No money, no honey? Financial versus knowledge and demand constraints on innovation. Research Policy, 46(2), 510-521.
Pérez, E.O., & Toro, I. (2018). Study of the realized absorptive capacity in the organizations of Colombia and Brazil. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(4), 617-631.
Pisano, G. (2006). Can science be a business? Lessons from Biotech. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 114-125.
René, B., Carree, M., Diederenc, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8-9), 1237-1263.
Richardson, G. (1972). The Organisation of Industry. The Economic Journal, 82(327), 883-896.
Sánchez, I., Juliao, J., & Zuluaga, J. (2013). La relación entre las redes externas de trabajo y el desempeño innovador de las pymes colombianas: un análisis del rol moderador del ambiente industrial. Estudios Gerenciales, 29, 339-349.
Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., & Carayannis, E. (2017). The effect of social networking sites and absorptive capacity on SMES’ innovation performance. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 409-424.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research Methods for Business (Quinta ed.). Cornwall, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
SENPLADES (2012). Transformación de la matriz productiva. Quito: Ediecuatorial.
Sok, P., & O’Cass, A. (2011). Achieving superior innovation-based performance outcomes in SMEs through innovation resource-capability complementarity. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 1285-1293.
Stock, G.N., Greis, N.P., & Fischer, W.A. (2001). Absorptive capacity and new product development. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(1), 77-91.
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
Tsai, W. (2008). External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1), 91-112.
Utterback, J.M., & Abernathy, W.J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation . Omega, 3(6), 639-656.
Verhees, F., & Meulenberg, M. (2004). Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management , 42(2), 134-154.
Wagner, T. (2013). Crear Innovadores. Bogotá, Colombia: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Wang, K., Hermens, A., Huang, K.-P., & Chelliah, J. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation and organizational learning on SME's innovation. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 7(4), 65-75.
Weerawardena, J., Mort, G., Liesch, P., & Knight, G. (2007). Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective . Journal of World Business, 42(3), 294-306.
Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25, 609-619.
Yam, R.C., Lo, W., Tang, E.P., & Law, A.K. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Research Policy, 40(3), 391-402.
Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
Zhai, Y.-M., Sun, W.-Q., Tsai, S.-B., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., & Chen, Q. (2018). An Empirical Study on Entrepreneurial Orientation, Absorptive Capacity, and SMEs’ Innovation Performance: A Sustainable Perspective. Sustainability, 10(2), 314.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
El envío de un manuscrito a la Revista supone que el trabajo no ha sido publicado anteriormente (excepto en la forma de un abstract o como parte de una tesis), que no está bajo consideración para su publicación en ninguna otra revista o editorial y que, en caso de aceptación, los autores están conforme con la transferencia automática del copyright a la Revista para su publicación y difusión. Los autores retendrán los derechos de autor para usar y compartir su artículo con un uso personal, institucional o con fines docentes; igualmente retiene los derechos de patente, de marca registrada (en caso de que sean aplicables) o derechos morales de autor (incluyendo los datos de investigación).
Los artículos publicados en la Revista están sujetos a la licencia Creative Commons CC-BY-SA de tipo Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual. Se permite el uso comercial de la obra, reconociendo su autoría, y de las posibles obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales se debe hacer con una licencia igual a la que regula la obra original.
Hasta el volumen 21 se ha estado empleando la versión de licencia CC-BY-SA 3.0 ES y se ha comenzado a usar la versión CC-BY-SA 4.0 desde el volumen 22.
