Determinantes de éxito en sistemas de gestión del conocimiento: propiedades psicométricas preliminares de cuatro instrumentos de medida ((Success determinants in KMS: preliminary psychometric properties of four measurement instruments)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6800752Palabras clave:
Sistemas de gestión del conocimiento, determinantes de éxito, análisis factorial, Knowledge Management Systems, determinants of success, factor analysis, Higher EducationResumen
El objetivo de este artículo es evaluar las propiedades psicométricas preliminares de cuatro instrumentos relacionados con las medidas de “Determinantes de Éxito en Sistemas de Gestión del Conocimiento (SGC) en Instituciones de Educación Superior (IES)”. La muestra fue de N=150 participantes, conformada por académicos, administrativos e investigadores de IES latinoamericanas. Se estimó la composición factorial utilizando extracción de mínimos cuadrados ordinales no ponderados con rotación oblimin directa y estimación de confiabilidad. Se encontró que los instrumentos poseen una estructura congruente con la teoría (α>0,90), concluyéndose acerca de su usabilidad y aplicabilidad para levantar datos referentes a los determinantes de éxito en SGC en IES. Como resultado se obtuvo cuatro instrumentos válidos y confiables, cuyos componentes representan los constructos planteados y poseen alta consistencia interna.
English abstract
The aim of this article is to evaluate the preliminary psychometric properties of four instruments related to the measures of "Determinants of Success in Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) in Institutions of Higher Education (HEI´s)”. The sample was N = 150 participants, made up of academics, administrators, and researchers from Latin American HEIs. The factorial composition was estimated using unweighted ordinal least squares extraction with direct oblimin rotation and reliability estimation. It was found that the instruments have a structure consistent with the theory (α> 0,90), concluding about their usability and applicability to collect data regarding the determinants of success in KMS in HEI´s. As a result, four valid and reliable instruments were obtained, whose components represent the proposed constructs and have high internal consistency.
Descargas
Citas
Aiken, L. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 955-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Alenezi, A. y Emmanouilidis, C. (2017). Utilising learning analytics in knowledge management adoption for effective manufacturing education. En Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXI (pp. 534-539). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-792-4-534
Al-Hayaly, M.A.M. y Alnajjar, F.J.S. (2016). Knowledge Management Processes and Their Impact on Organizational Performance, the Adoption Balanced Scorecard: The Moderating Role of Quality Assurance Standards-An Applied Study on Private Jordanian Universities. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(6), 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v11n6p70
Ali, N., Che Cob, Z. y Sulaiman, H. (2016). Knowledge management systems success model for higher education institutions: A partial least square approach. En Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe) (pp. 252-257), Chiang Mai, Thailand. Recuperado de http://repo.uum.edu.my/20092/1/KMICe2016%20252%20257.pdf
Aravena, P., Moraga, J., Cartes-Velásquez, R. y Manterola, C. (2014). Validez y confiabilidad en investigación odontológica. International Journal of Odontostomatology, 8(1), 69-75. Recuperado de https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/ijodontos/v8n1/art09.pdf
Assegaff, S. (2017). Evaluasi pemanfaatan media sosial sebagai sarana knowledge sharing. Journal Managment Technology, 16(3), 271-293. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Setiawan-Assegaff/project/Social-Media-and-Knowledge-Sharing/attachment/5a66ed85b53d2f0bba4d1e29/AS:585875096363008@1516694916496/download/2114-4661-2-PB.pdf?context=ProjectUpdatesLog
Astuti, A. y Suryadi, K. (2015). Assessing knowledge management systems’ success based on technical and social factors. En Proceeding 8th International Seminar on Industrial Engineering and Management (DSS-67-74). Recuperado de https://isiem.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/DSS-9-Amalia-Yuli-Astuti-2015.pdf
Atanasova, I. (2019). A university knowledge management tool for the evaluation of the efficiency and quality of learning resources in distance e-Learning. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.201910010
Bermeo-Giraldo, M.C., Acevedo, Y., Palacios, L., Benjumea, M. y Arango-Botero, D. (2020). Evolución y tendencias investigativas sobre estrategias de gestión de conocimiento en instituciones de educación superior. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, (60), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.35575/rvucn.n60a11
Bessa, J., Branco, F., Costa, A.R., Gonçalves, R. y Moreira, F. (2018). Proposal of a BI/SSBI system for knowledge management of the traffic of a network infrastructure - A university of Trásos-Montes e Alto Douro case study. En World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (Ed.), Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 678-690). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_68
Brewer, P.D. y Brewer, K.L. (2010). Knowledge Management, Human Resource Management, and Higher Education: A Theoretical Model. The Journal of Education for Business, 85, 330-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832321003604938
Chakrabarti, D., Arora, M. y Sharma, P. (2018). Evaluating knowledge quality in knowledge management systems. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 7(1), 75-84. Recuperado de https://www.academia.edu/download/58089418/2018_KM_MA_DC.pdf
De Freitas, V. y Yáber, G. (2018). Information management as a determinant of success in knowledge management systems. Journal of Business, 10 (2), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.21678/jb.2018.963
De Freitas, V., Yáber, G. y Zerpa, C. (2020). Knowledge management systems: structural model of its success determinants in Latin America higher education institutions. Journal of Business, Universidad Del Pacífico, 12(2), 30-51. https://doi.org/10.21678/jb.2020.1483
Delgado, E., Carretero, H. y Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidence in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12(3), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-64551
DeLone, W.H. y McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Elosua, P. y Zumbo, B. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20(4), 896-901. Recuperado de https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/8747
Escala, A.L. (2020). Desarrollo de un instrumento de medición para la gestión del conocimiento en una universidad privada. Revista Cubana de Educación Superior, 39(3). Recuperado de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0257-43142020000300015&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M.L. y García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2014). Knowledge spirals in higher education teaching innovation. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkm.2014100102
Gadermann, A., Guhn, M., y Zumbo, B. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 17(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7275/n560-j767
Girarte, J. y del Valle, J. (2020). Validación de un instrumento sobre habilidades informativas. Apertura, 12(1), 152-162. Recuperado de http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/apertura/index.php/apertura/article/view/1812/1162
Giuri, P., Munari, F., Scandura, A. y Toschi, L. (2019). The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.030
Goswami, M. y Goswami, A. (2013). Integrated Framework for implementing knowledge management in contemporary organizations. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(6), 611-618. Recuperado de https://www.ripublication.com/gjmbs_spl/gjmbsv3n6_07.pdf
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. y Black, W. (1999). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Halawi, L.A., McCarthy, R.V. y Aronson, J.E. (2008). An Empirical Investigation of Knowledge Management Systems’ Success. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2008.11646014
Izquierdo, I., Olea, J. y Abad, F.J. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26(3), 395-400. Recuperado de http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/4206.pdf
Jennex, M.E. (2017). Re-Examining the Jennex Olfman knowledge management success model. En Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4375-4384). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.567
Jennex, M.E. y Olfman, L. (2011). A model of knowledge management success. En M.E. Jennex y Smolnik, S. (ed), Strategies for knowledge management success: exploring organizational efficacy (pp. 14-31). Hersey, New York: Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/jkm.2006070104
Jennex, M.E., Smolnik, S. y Croasdell, D.T. (2011). Towards a consensus knowledge management success definition. En M.E. Jennex y Smolnik, S. (ed), Strategies for knowledge management success: exploring organizational efficacy (pp. 1-13). Hersey, New York: Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720910988878
Johnson, D-G. (2017). Assessing knowledge management systems implementation in Ghanaian universities (dissertation doctoral). University of South Africa, Pretoria. Recuperado de https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/85157427.pdf
Kaiser, H. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
Ledesma, R., Ferrando, P. y Tosi, J. (2019). Uso del análisis factorial exploratorio en RIDEP. Recomendaciones para autores y revisores. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 52(3), 173-180. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4596/459661296014/459661296014.pdf
Leyva, O. y Olague, J. (2014). Modelo de ecuaciones estructurales por el método de mínimos cuadrados parciales (partial least squares-PLS). En K. Sáenz y Tamez, G. (ed). Métodos y técnicas cualitativas y cuantitativas aplicables a la investigación en ciencias sociales (pp. 480-497). México: Tirant Humanidades México.
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A. y Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Mahdi, O.R., Nassar, I.A. y Almsafir, M.K. (2019). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013
Marouf, L.N. y Agarwal, N.K. (2016). Are Faculty Members Ready? Individual Factors Affecting Knowledge Management Readiness in Universities. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 15(3), 1650024. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649216500246
Méndez, C. y Rondón, M. (2012). Introducción al análisis factorial exploratorio. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 41 (1), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60077-9
Mochales, G. (2014). Modelo explicativo de la responsabilidad social corporativa estratégica (dissertation doctoral). Madrid, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Recuperado de https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/24572/1/T35154.pdf
Naranjo, S., González, D.L. y Rodríguez, J. (2016). El Reto de la Gestión del Conocimiento en las Instituciones de Educación Superior Colombianas. Folios, (44), 151-164. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3459/345945922010.pdf
Natek, S. y Lesjak, D. (2013). Improving knowledge management by integrating HEI process and data models. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(4), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645653
Nattapol, N., Peter, R. y Laddawan, K. (2010). An investigation of the determinants of knowledge management systems success in banking industry. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 4(11), 2183-2190. Recuperado de https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.309.8525&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Ocampo, C., Valencia, J.A., Moreno, L.M. y Bermeo, M.C. (2020). Estudio bibliométrico de modelos de gestión de conocimiento en instituciones de educación superior. Ph. D.(C) Carlos Augusto Arboleda Jaramillo Ph. D.(C) Francisco Javier Arias Vargas, 127. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maria-Bermeo-Giraldo/publication/343775171_Estudio_bibliometrico_de_modelos_de_gestion_de_conocimiento_en_instituciones_de_educacion_superior/links/5f3ee47a458515b72936d72a/Estudio-bibliometrico-de-modelos-de-gestion-de-conocimiento-en-instituciones-de-educacion-superior.pdf
Ojo, A. (2016). Knowledge management in Nigerian universities: A conceptual model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, 11, 331-345. Recuperado de https://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3607
Ortiz, J.J. y Zacarías, J.A. (2016). Percepciones sobre el modelo de gestión del conocimiento de las IES colombianas a partir de las integraciones sistémicas entre los procesos de investigación-docencia y proyección social. Criterio libre, 14(24), 201-227. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2016v14n24.88
Pérez, R., Mercado, P., Martínez, M., Mena, E. y Partida, J.Á. (2018). La sociedad del conocimiento y la sociedad de la información como la piedra angular en la innovación tecnológica educativa. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 8(16), 847-870. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.371
Puspita, M., Rahmatunnisa, M., Sumaryana, A. y Kristiadi, J.B. (2018). Ensuring service quality in education for Indonesia’s sustainable education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(4), 65-81. Recuperado de https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jsser/issue/43626/534250
RAE (2020). Diccionario de la Lengua Española. Real Academia Española.
Robles, B.F. (2018). Índice de validez de contenido: Coeficiente V de Aiken. Pueblo Continente, 29(1), 193-197. Recuperado http://200.62.226.189/PuebloContinente/article/view/991
Salim, J., Yahya, Y., Othman, M.S. y Rashid, N.R. (2007). The Use of Holistic Approach to Knowledge Management Initiative in Managing Information in Higher Learning Institution: A Perspective. In 6th WSEAS International Conference on E-ACTIVITIES, (pp 347-352). Tenerife. Spain. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237571770_The_Use_of_Holistic_Approach_to_Knowledge_Management_Initiative_in_Managing_Information_in_Higher_Learning_Institution_A_Perspective
Shannak, R., Masa’deh, R., Al-Zu’bul, Z., Obeidat, B., Alshurideh, M. y Altamony, H (2012). A theoretical perspective on the relationship between knowledge management systems, customer knowledge management, and competitive advantage. European Journal of Social Sciences, 32(4), 520-532. Recuperado de http://eacademic.ju.edu.jo/b.obeidat/Lists/Published%20Research/Attachments/8/theory.pdf
Singhal, P. (2012). Enhancing satisfaction of knowledge user through quality of KMS: An empirical study. Special Issue of International Journal of Computer Applications, 22-26. Recuperado de https://research.ijcaonline.org/icnict/number5/icnict1031.pdf
Soriano, A. (2015). Diseño y validación de instrumentos de medición. Diálogos, 14, 19-40. Recuperado de http://redicces.org.sv/jspui/bitstream/10972/2105/1/2%20disenoyvalidacion_dialogos14.pdf
Sunalai, S. (2015). Knowledge management systems in higher education institutions in Thailand: A holistic model of enablers, processes, and outcomes (dissertation doctoral). Texas A&M University. Recuperado de https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/156246
Vangala, R., Banerjee, A. y Hiremath, B. (2017). An association between information and communication technology and agriculture knowledge management process in Indian milk co-operatives and non-profit organizations: An empirical analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.03621. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.03621
Veer-Ranjeawon, P. y Rowley, J. (2019). Embedding knowledge management in higher education institutions (HEIs) a comparison between two countries. Studies in Higher Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1608431
Yigzaw, S.T., Jormanainen, I. y Tukiainen, M. (2019). Trends in the role of ICT in higher education knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review. En Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 473-480). https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362805
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 GECONTEC: Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
