Towards a new architecture for progressive international capital taxation

Authors

  • Valpy FitzGerald Emeritus Professor of International Development Finance, University of Oxford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/rec.10712

Abstract

The application and operation of the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules agreed at the OECD and released in December 2021 have both strengths and weaknesses for developing countries. Now is the time to address directly the multilateral institutional "architecture" in relation to international tax negotiations. Despite the current geopolitical tensions, the nature of climate change and increased possibility of future health pandemics have made the need for global public goods provision – and thus global tax coordination – even more necessary. Moreover, the GloBe rules reflect the underrepresentation of non-OECD members in the process of the "Inclusive Framework," as evidenced by their absence in key committee leadership, paucity of specialised delegates and lack of explicit voting rights. Therefore, it is correct to welcome the recent UN resolution to work towards a worldwide Tax Convention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Valpy FitzGerald, Emeritus Professor of International Development Finance, University of Oxford

Valpy FitzGerald was trained as an economist at Oxford (BA, 1968) and Cambridge (PhD, 1972). Between these two degrees he worked for The Economist. Valpy was Assistant Director of Development Studies at Cambridge (1973-79), Professor of Development Economics at Erasmus University Rotterdam (1980-91) and Professor of International Development Finance at Oxford (1992-2014). Since retirement he is Emeritus Professor of Oxford University and Emeritus Fellow of St Antony´s College.
During his professional career Professor FitzGerald acted as macroeconomic adviser to a number of Latin American governments; as well as several United Nations agencies and the OECD. He acted as adviser on international investment to the newly formed UK Department for International Development 1997-2002, contributing to the seminal 2000 White Paper Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalization Work for the Poor.
Valpy has a close relationship with progressive Spanish academic economics, having held the Queen Victoria Eugenia chair at the Universidad Complutense (Madrid) 1995-6 and 1996-7; receiving the Gabarrón Prize in Economics in 2007 and an Honorary Doctorate from the Complutense in 2014. He was elected Honorary President of the Sociedad de Economia Mundial in 2015.
Currently, he serves as a commissioner – with colleagues Piketty, Zucman, Ocampo and Stiglitz - on the Independent Commission on the Reform of International Corporate Taxation (ICRICT): www.icrict.org. Since its formation in 2015, the Commission has influenced international negotiations on global corporate tax reform, and is now working on the effective taxation of private wealth.
Valpy continues to actively research the relationship between income and wealth on the one hand, and macroconomic policy and international finance on the other.

References

Aslam, Aquib and María Delgado Coelho (2021): "A Firm Lower Bound: Characteristics and Impact of Corporate Minimum Taxation." IMF Working Paper WP/21/161. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513561073.001

Crivelli, Ernesto, Ruud De Mooij, and Michael Keen (2015): "Base Erosion, Profit Shifting and Developing Countries." IMF Working Paper WP/15/118. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513563831.001

Ferreira Liotti, Belisa, Joy Waruguru Ndubai, Ruth Wamuyu, Ivan Lazarov and Jeffrey Owens (2022): "The treatment of tax incentives under Pillar Two." Transnational Corporations Vol. 29 No. 2. Geneva: UNCTAD. https://doi.org/10.18356/2076099x-29-2-2

FitzGerald, Valpy (2012): "Global capital markets, direct taxation and the redistribution of income." International Review of Applied Economics, 26:2, 241-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2011.640313

FitzGerald, Valpy and Erika Dayle Siu (2019): "The Effects of International Tax Competition on National Income Distribution." pp. 243–272 in Ocampo, José Antonio ed. International Policy Rules and Inequality. Columbia University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.7312/ocam19084-009

G20/OECD (2021): Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy. Paris: OECD.

ICRICT (2019): International corporate tax reform. October, 2019. (www.icrict.org)

ICRICT (2022): It is time for a global asset registry to tackle hidden wealth. https://www.icrict.com/it-is-time-for-a-global-asset-registry-to-tackle-hidden-wealth.

IMF (2022): Fiscal Monitor. April 2022. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

IMF (2023): International Corporate Tax Reform, IMF Policy Paper. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400232558.007

Klemm, Alexander and Stefan van Parys (2012): "Empirical evidence on the effects of tax incentives." International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 12, pp. 393–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9194-8.

OECD (1998): Harmful Tax Competition: an emerging global issue. OECD, Paris.

OECD (2022): Tax Incentives and the Global Minimum Corporate Tax: Reconsidering Tax Incentives after the GloBE Rules. OECD, Paris.

Stausholm, Saila Naomi (2017): Rise of ineffective incentives: New empirical evidence on tax holidays in developing countries. Copenhagen Business School. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4sn3k

UN (2001): Report of the High-level Panel on Financing for Development ('Zedillo Commission'). New York: United Nations.

UN: The 17 Sustainable Development Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

Zee, Howell H., Janet Gale Stotsky and Eduardo Ley (2002): "Tax Incentives for Business Investment: A Primer for Policy Makers in Developing Countries." World Development, Vol. 30(9), pp. 1497–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00050-5

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

FitzGerald, Valpy. 2024. “Towards a New Architecture for Progressive International Capital Taxation”. Revista De Economía Crítica, no. 37 (June):174-83. https://doi.org/10.46661/rec.10712.