Las ganancias del comercio y el intercambio desigual en los modelos del comercio internacional
Las ganancias del comercio y el intercambio desigual en los modelos del comercio internacional.
Keywords:
países en desarrollo, comercio mutuamente ventajoso, modelos clásicos y neoclásicos del comercioAbstract
The problem of the unequal exchange of labour between developed and developing countries is examined, along with its link with the conditions of trade of mutual benefit. For this purpose the main theoretical models of international trade based on comparative advantages are used, along with an extension to the case of two factors of the concept of exchange rate of labour derived from trade. As a result it is concluded that the unequal exchange is inherent to the trade between countries with different levels of development as long as it is based on mutual benefit, and that it plays a role in widening of the opening in the per capita rent of these countries.
Downloads
References
AMÍN, S. (1975): ¿Cómo funciona el capitalismo? El intercambio desigual y la ley del valor, Siglo XXI, Madrid.
BARRIENTOS, S. (1991): "The classical foundations of unequal exchange: a critical analysis", British Review of Economic Issues 29, pp. 61-86.
BHAGWATI, J. N. (1964): "The pure theory of international trade: a survey", Economic Journal, pp. 1-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228112
BHAGWATI, J. N. (1981): International Trade: Selected Reading, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
DORNBUSCH, R., S. FISHER y P. SAMUELSON (1977): "Comparative advantage, trade and payments in a Ricardian model", American Economic Review, pp. 823-839.
EMMANUEL, A. (1972): El intercambio desigual, Siglo XXI, Madrid.
GRILLI, E. Y M. YANG (1988): Primary Commodity Prices, Manufactured Goods Prices, and the Terms of Trade of Developing Countries: What the Long Run Shows, World Bank Economic Review, enero de 1988, pp. 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/2.1.1
HARRIS, N. (1991). "Theories of Unequal Exchange", in City, class and trade: social and economic change in the third World. London, Tauris in assoc. with the developing Planning Unit Univ. College London. Pp. 173-183.
HEINTZ, J. (2003). The new face of unequal exchange: low-wage manufacturing, commodity chains, and global inequality, Political Economy Research Institute, Working Paper Series Vol. 59. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.427680
JONES, R. (1956): "Factor proportions and the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem", Review of Economic Studies, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296232
JONES, R. (1965). "The structure of simple general equilibrium models", Journal of Political Economy 73, pp. 557-572. https://doi.org/10.1086/259084
JONES, R. (1971). "A three-factor model in theory, trade and history", in J. Bhagwati Trade, balance of payments and growth. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1971 pp. 3-21.
KRUGMAN, P., AND OBSTFELD, N. (2001). Economía Internacional: teoría y política, 5ª ed. Pearson Educación S.A., Madrid.
MARTÍNEZ SOLER, F. (2002), Macroeconomía de una Economía Abierta y Economía Internacional, Vols. I y II, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Almería, Almería, España.
MUÑOZ CIDAD, C. y S. SOSVILLA RIVERO (1993) "La polémica sobre la evolución sobre la relación real de intercambio de los países subdesarrollados", Revista de Economía Aplicada 1, pp. 165-186.
NEGISHI, T. (1999) "Unequal exchange and exploitations", The Japanese Economic Review 2, pp. 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5876.00107
PREBISCH, R. (1950): The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems, United Nations, New York.
PREBISCH, R. (1959) "International Trade and Payments in an Era of Coexistence, Commercial Policy in the Underdeveloped Countries", American Economic Review 44, pp. 251-273.
PREBISCH, R. (1963): Toward a Dynamic Development Policy for Latin America, United Nations, New York.
SALVATORE, D. (1992): Microeconomic Theory, 3ª ed., McGraw Hill, New York.
SAMUELSON, P. (1971). "Ohlin was right", Swedish Journal of Economics 73, pp. 365-384.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3439219
SINGER, H. (1950) "The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries", American Economic Review 40, pp. 473-485.
