Sobre el 'Nobel' de economía a Paul M. Romer

Autores/as

  • Ramón Boixadera Bosch Gabinete Técnico Estatal FSC-CCOO

Palabras clave:

Nobel, Romer, crecimiento económico

Resumen

La teoría del crecimiento “endógeno”, capitaneada por Paul M. Romer, reavivó el interés de la economía convencional por el efecto de las variables tecnológicas e institucionales en el desarrollo de largo plazo, al incorporar una explicación del incremento de la productividad y justificar la importancia del ahorro y la intervención pública como determinantes en la tasa de crecimiento. Sin embargo, los modelos “endógenos” han resultado difíciles de validar empíricamente y parecen particularmente expuestos a las críticas de exceso de formalismo y falta de claridad conceptual que el propio Romer ha dirigido recientemente contra el resto de la macroeconomía marginalista.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Arrow, K.J. (1962) "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing", *Review of Economic Studies*, 29(3), p.155-173.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952

Cohen, A.J.; Harcourt, G.C. (2003) "Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Controversies?" *Journal of Economic Perspectives*, 17(1), p.199-214.

https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321165010

Durlauf, S.; Johnson, P.; Temple, J. (2005) "Growth Econometrics" en: Aghion, P.; Durlauf, S. (eds.) *Handbook of Economic Growth*, North-Holland: Amsterdam, p. 555-677.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01008-7

Fine, B. (2000) "Endogenous growth theory: a critical assessment" *Cambridge Journal of Economics*, 24, p.245-265.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/24.2.245

Krugman, P. (2013) "The New Growth Fizzle", *New York Times*, August 18th, [https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/the-new-growth-fizzle/](https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/the-new-growth-fizzle/)

Lucas, R.E., Jr. (2003) "Macroeconomic Priorities", *American Economic Review*, 93(1), March, p. 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455133

Lucas, R.E., Jr. (1988) "On the Mechanics of Economic Development", *Journal of Monetary Economics*, 22, July, p. 3-42.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7

Romer, P. M. (1986) "Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth", *Journal of Political Economy*, 94, October, p. 1002-1037.

https://doi.org/10.1086/261420

Romer, P.M. (1990) "Human Capital and Growth: Theory and evidence", *Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy*, 32, p. 251-286.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(90)90028-J

Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997) "I Just Ran Two Million Regressions", *American Economic Review*, 87(2), May, p.178-193.

https://doi.org/10.3386/w6252

Romer, P.M. (1994) "The Origins of Endogenous Growth", *Journal of Economic Perspectives*, 8(1), p. 3-22.

https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.3

Romer, P. M. (2015) "Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth", *American Economic Review*, 105(5), p. 89-93.

https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151066

Romer, P. M. (2016) "The Trouble With Macroeconomics", *The American Economist*, forthcoming.

Solow, R. (1987) "Growth Theory and After" Prize Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel, December 8th.

Steedman, I. (2001) "On 'Measuring' Knowledge in New (Endogenous) Growth Theory", Growth Theory Conference, Pisa (Italy), October 5-7th.

Temple, J. (1999). "The New Growth Evidence", *Journal of Economic Literature*, XXVII, March, p.112-156.

https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.1.112

Zumbrun, J.; Talley, I. (2018) "World Bank Unfairly Influenced Its Own Competitiveness Rankings", *Wall Street Journal*, 12 de enero, [https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-bank-unfairly-influenced-its-owncompetitiveness-rankings-1515797620](https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-bank-unfairly-influenced-its-owncompetitiveness-rankings-1515797620).

Descargas

Publicado

02-06-2021

Cómo citar

Boixadera Bosch, Ramón. 2021. «Sobre El ’Nobel’ De economía a Paul M. Romer». Revista De Economía Crítica, n.º 26 (junio):19-22. https://upo.es/revistas/index.php/rec/article/view/10104.

Número

Sección

Temas extra