From the Republic to the Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.1579Keywords:
republicanism, democracy, government, representation, condominiumAbstract
Reworking the republican tradition is a basis of a contemporary philosophy of government. This paper attempts to give a sense of the direction in which a reworked republicanism would take democratic theory. The paper is in three sections. The first presents a sketch of neorepublican theory. The second develops an example: el condominium. And the third spells out the broad lessons for democratic theory
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repensar la tradición republicana es una base para una filosofía contemporánea del gobierno. Este trabajo trata de dar sentido a la dirección en la que un republicanismo repensado tomaría la teoría democrática. Se divide en tres secciones. La primera presenta un esquema de la teoría neorrepublicana. La segunda desarrolla un ejemplo: el condominio. Y la tercera explica las amplias lecciones que se derivan de lo estudiado para la teoría democrática.
Downloads
References
Bentham, J. (1843). Anarchical Fallacies. The Works of Jeremy Bentham. J. Bowring. Edinburgh. 2.
Bodin, J. (1992). On Sovereignty. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Bratman, M. (1999). Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, M.A., M.I.T. Press.
Clark, A. (1999). ‘‘Leadership and Influence: The Manager as Coach, Nanny and Artificial DNA’’. The Biology of Business: de-coding the Natural Laws of Enterprise. J. Clippinger. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass: 46-66.
Habermas, J. (1984, 1989). A Theory of Communicative Action, Vols1 and 2. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (1973). “Rawls on Liberty and its Priority.” University of Chicago Law Review 40: 534-55.
Hobbes, T. (1994). Leviathan. ed E.Curley. Indianapolis, Hackett.
Laborde, C. and J. Maynor, Eds. (2007). Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford, Blackwell.
List, C. and P. Pettit (2002). “Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result.” Economics and Philosophy 18: 89-
Lovett, F. N. (2001). “Domination: A Preliminary Analysis.” Monist 84: 98-112.
Madison, J., A. Hamilton and J. Jay (1987). The Federalist Papers. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the Modern World. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Moon, J. D. (2003). “Rawls and Habermas on Public Reason.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 257-74.
Nussbaum, M. (1992). “Human Functioning and Social Justice.” Political Theory 20: 202-46.
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2000). ‘‘Minority Claims under Two Conceptions of Democracy’’. Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. D. Ivison, P. Patton and W. Sanders. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 199-215.
Pettit, P. (2004). “Depoliticizing Democracy.” Ratio Juris 17: 52-65.
Pettit, P. (2007a). ‘‘Joining the Dots’’. Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit. M. Smith, H. G. Brennan, R. E. Goodin and F. C. Jackson. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2007b). ‘‘Republican Liberty: Three Axioms, Four Theorems’’. Republicanism and Political Theory. C. Laborde & J. Manor. Oxford, Blackwells.
Pettit, P. (2008). The Basic Liberties. Essasys on H.L.A.Hart. M. Kramer. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. and D. Schweikard (2006). “Joint Action and Group Agency.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36.
Pettit, P. and M. Smith (1996). “Freedom in Belief and Desire.” Journal of Philosophy 93: 429-49; reprinted in F.Jackson, P.Pettit and M.Smith, 2004, Mind, Morality and Explanation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Rousseau, J. J. (1973). The Social Contract and Discourses. London, J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open access policy
Free and open access is allowed to any interested party to all the contents of the journal issues, free of charge, being able to print and transfer all the articles, with the only condition of specifying the source and authorship.
The journal: a) does not charge authorship costs for the processing of articles or for their submission, b) maintains copyright for authors without restrictions, c) facilitates authors to keep their publication rights without limitations.
The International Journal of Political Thought is an original work of the Laboratory of Political Ideas and Practices of the Pablo de Olavide University. All articles included in the Journal are original work of their respective authors. This Journal is freely offered to the scientific and academic community at no cost and releases the contents according to the license "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 CC BY-NC-SA" of the Creative Commons project available in the following url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
If you wish to translate or compile any of the articles available here, please contact us at contacto
ISSN: 1885-589X 
Universidad Pablo de Olavide