United States Military Intervention in Central America and the Caribbean

A Socio-Voluntaristic Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.10549

Keywords:

Military intervention, political stability, United States foreign policy

Abstract

Why are foreign military interventions effective in establishing political stability in some cases but not in others? The present study answers the question through comparative historical analysis by examining nine cases of United States military intervention in Central America and the Caribbean: Panama (1903-1925), Cuba (1906-1922), Nicaragua (1909-1933), Dominican Republic (1912-1924), Haiti (1915-1934), Dominican Republic (1965-1966), Grenada (1983-1985), Panama (1989-1994), and Haiti (1994-1997). The study proposes a holistic theory of political stabilization through foreign military intervention that takes into consideration both social preconditions in the target state as well as voluntaristic factors pertinent to the intervening power, thus bridging divergent approaches from the fields of Comparative Politics and International Relations, respectively. The study finds that foreign military intervention is more effective in establishing political stability in target states that experience a process of nation-building before the intervention and in target states where the post-intervention regime is neither so low-power that it is incapable of performing the political functions expected of it by the nation or so high-power that it represses broad sectors of society that play an influential role in the nation. These findings have important implications for both the scholarly community, which may expand this line of research by applying the socio-voluntaristic theory to other cases of foreign military intervention, as well as foreign policymaking circles, which may be inclined to reconsider not only how interventions are to be conducted but also where and when they are most likely to be effective in establishing political stability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abramson, S. F., & Carter, D. B. (2021). Systemic Instability and the Emergence of Border Disputes. International Organization, 75(1), 103–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000545

Andersen, D., Møller, J., Rørbæk, L. L., & Skaaning, S. E. (2014). State Capacity and Political Regime Stability. Democratization, 21(7), 1305–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.960204

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.

Baev, P. K. (1997). Conflict Management in the Former Soviet South: The Dead‐End of Russian Interventions. European Security, 6(4), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839708407341

Beardslee, W. Q. (1996). The United States’ Haitian Intervention: The Dangers of “Redefined” National Security Interests. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 25(1), 1–7.

Bellin, E. (2004). The Iraqi Intervention and Democracy in Comparative Historical Perspective. Political Science Quarterly, 119(4), 595–608.

Berger, M. T. (2006). From Nation-Building to State-Building: The Geopolitics of Development, the Nation-State System and the Changing Global Order. Third World Quarterly, 27(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500368719

Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (2006). Foundations of Multimethod Research: Synthesizing Styles. Sage.

Brownlee, J. (2007). Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge University Press.

Bueno de Mesquita, B., Morrow, J. D., Siverson, R. M., & Smith, A. (1999). An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 791–807.

Burnell, P. (2006). Autocratic Opening to Democracy: Why Legitimacy Matters. Third World Quarterly, 27(4), 545–562.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590600720710

Carnegie, A., & Mikulaschek, C. (2020). The Promise of Peacekeeping: Protecting Civilians in Civil Wars. International Organization, 74(4), 810–832. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000442

Chivvis, C. S., & Davis, P. K. (2011). Establishing Security. In Dilemmas of Intervention: Social Science for Stabilization and Reconstruction. RAND Corporation.

Conaghan, C. M., & Espinal, R. (1990). Unlikely Transitions to Uncertain Regimes? Democracy without Compromise in the Dominican Republic and Ecuador. Journal of Latin American Studies, 22(3), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00020952

Congressional Research Service. (2022). Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2022.

Dobbins, J., Jones, S. G., Crane, K., & Cole Degrasse, B. (2007). The Beginner’s Guide to Nation-Building. RAND Corporation.

Dobbins, J., McGinn, J. G., Crane, K., Jones, S. G., Lal, R., Rathmell, A., Swanger, R., & Timilsina, A. (2003). America’s Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Japan. RAND Corporation.

Duursma, A. (2020). African Solutions to African Challenges: The Role of Legitimacy in Mediating Civil Wars in Africa. International Organization, 74, 295–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000041

Eli Margolis, J. (2010). Understanding Political Stability and Instability. Civil Wars, 12(3), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2010.509568

Fjelde, H., & de Soysa, I. (2009). Coercion, Co-optation, or Cooperation?: State Capacity and the Risk of Civil War, 1961-2004. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 26(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894208097664

Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Cornell University Press.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Thoery Development in the Social Sciences. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

Goertz, G. (2017). Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies. Princeton University Press.

Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2012). A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton University Press.

Hall, P. (2003). Aligning Ontology and Methodology. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.

Hudson, R. A. (2002). Cuba: A Country Study (2nd ed.). Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.

Huntington, S. P. (1965). Political Development and Political Decay. World Politics, 17(3), 386–430.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2009286.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A07244520d1e332dd818e49533dd65bce

Hurwitz, L. (1973). Contemporary Approaches to Political Stability. Comparative Politics, 5(3), 449–463.

Hussaini, S. M. (2021). The Social Challenges of Modern State-Building in Afghanistan. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 16, 529–543.

King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press.

Kinzer, S. (2006). Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (1st ed.). Times Books.

Lee, M. M. (2020). Crippling Leviathan: How Foreign Subversion Weakens the State. Cornell University Press.

Lepingwell, J. W. R. (1994). The Russian Military and Security Policy in the “Near Abroad.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 36(3), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396339408442751

Levy, J. S., & Thompson, W. R. (2010). Causes of War. Wiley-Blackwell.

Library of Congress. (n.d.). Country Studies. https://www.loc.gov/collections/country-studies/about-this-collection/

Lyall, J. (2019). Civilian Casualties, Humanitarian Aid, and Insurgent Violence in Civil Wars. International Organization, 73(4), 901–926. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000262

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton.

Meditz, S. W., & Hanratty, D. M. (1989a). Islands of the Commonwealth Caribbean: A Regional Study. Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.

Meditz, S. W., & Hanratty, D. M. (1989b). Panama: A Country Study (4th ed.). Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. https://doi.org/101.22:550-46/987

Merrill, T. (1994). Nicaragua: A Country Study (2nd ed.). Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.

Metz, H. C. (2001). Dominican Republic and Haiti: Country Studies (2nd ed.). Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.

Moore, B. (1966). The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (1st ed.). Penguin University Books.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). To Intervene or Not to Intervene. Foreign Affairs, 45(3), 425–437.

Pei, M., Amin, S., & Garz, S. (2004, March 17). Why Nation-Building Fails in Mid-Course After U.S. Intervention. International Herald Tribune, 1–2.

Pei, M., & Kasper, S. (2003). Lessons from the Past: The American Record on Nation Building. In Policy Brief (Issue May).

Peksen, D., & Lounsbery, M. O. (2012). Beyond the Target State: Foreign Military Intervention and Neighboring State Stability.

International Interactions, 38(3), 348–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2012.676516

Perito, R. M. (2008). Police in Peace and Stability Operations: Evolving US Policy and Practice. International Peacekeeping, 15(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310701879910

Pickering, J., & Mitchell, D. F. (2018). Empirical Knowledge on Foreign Military Intervention. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Empirical International Relations Theory (pp. 714–736). Oxford University Press.

Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (1996). What Makes Democracies Endure? Jounal of Democracy, 7(1), 1–12.

Ragin, C. (2014). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press.

Schram, P. (2021). Hassling: How States Prevent a Preventive War. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 294–308.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12538

Sharpe, J. (1993). “The Original Paradise.” Transition, 62, 48–57.

Shashenkov, M. (1994). Russian Peacekeeping in the “Near Abroad.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 36(3), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396339408442750

Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press.

Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social Structure and Organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations (pp. 142–193). Rand McNally.

Sullivan, P. L., & Koch, M. T. (2009). Military Intervention by Powerful States, 1945-2003. Journal of Peace Research, 46(5), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343309336796

Uzonyi, G., Souva, M., & Golder, S. N. (2012). Domestic Institutions and Credible Signals. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00746.x

Watts, S., Martini, J., Campbell, J. H., Toukan, M., & Kwon, I. (2021). Using U.S. Leverage to Limit Instability in Fragile States: Executive Summary. In RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr-a250-2

Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Wiegand, K. E., Powell, E. J., & McDowell, S. (2021). The Peaceful Resolution of Territorial Disputes Dataset, 1945–2015. Journal of Peace Research, 58(2), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319895560

Wimmer, A., & Feinstein, Y. (2010). The Rise of the Nation-State across the World, 1816 to 2001. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 764–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410382639

Yates, L. A. (2015). Power Pack: U.S. Intervention in the Dominican Republic, 1965-1966. Combat Studies Institute.

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Grass, K. (2025). United States Military Intervention in Central America and the Caribbean: A Socio-Voluntaristic Perspective. International Journal of Political Thought, 20, 329–357. https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.10549

Issue

Section

Monograph 3

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.