The concept of hegemony in international relations: a criticism of Andreas Antoniades

Authors

  • Eduardo Molina-Campano Laboratorio de Ideas y Prácticas Políticas (UPO), Sevilla, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.4827

Keywords:

hegemony, international relations, international political economy, coercion, consent and power movement

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the different theoretical approaches existing in the discipline of international relations in relation to the concept
of hegemony. For this, the Gramscian origin of the term and its subsequent evolution will be investigated until it reaches the debate that concerns us. Within this discussion the author will focus on the study of the proposal of Andreas Antoniades defined as -Power Movement- in order to subject it to criticism from the perspective of the Critical International Political Economy. This perspective that the author will leave semi implicitly raised has two fundamental elements that characterize it, namely: it takes the sub discipline of international political economy as an approach to the analysis of international relations but secondly it does so from a critical materialist position regarding the schools in force in schools such subdiscipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, S.,“El imperialismo contemporáneo”, El viejo topo, volumen 336, 2016, pp. 42-51.

Anderson, P. (1981) Las antinomias de Antonio Gramsci. Barcelona: Editorial Fontamara.

Antoniades, A., “From theories of Hegemony to Hegemony analysis in International Relations”. Paper presented at: 49 ISA Annual Convention. Panel: Hegemony, Security, and Defense in IR, 2008. Available at: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/2175 (Accessed: 10 Octuber 2019)

Arrighi, G. (1999) El largo siglo XX. Madrid: Akal.

Ceceña, A., “Estrategias de construcción de una hegemonía sin límites”, en: Ana Esther Ceceña, compiladora. Hegemonías y emancipaciones en el siglo XXI. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2004, pp. 20-32. Disponible en: http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/gt/20101018122244/3cecena.pdf (Consultado: 30 Octubre 2019)

Cox, R., “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations”, in Essay in Method, Millennium:Journal of International Studies, volumen 12, nº 2, 1983, pp.162-175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701 (Accessed: 5 September 2019)

Gramsci, A. (1981) Los cuadernos de la cárcel. México: Ediciones Era.

Keohane, R. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Laclau, E. y Mouffe, C. (1987) Hegemonía y estrategia socialista. Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Manfredi, J., “Hacia una teoría comunicativa de la diplomacia pública”, Comunicación y Sociedad, volumen XXIV, nº2, 2011, pp-199-225. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/10171/27282 (Consultado: 25 Septiembre 2019)

Maquiavelo, N. (2012) El prícipe. Madrid: Editorial Edaf.

Molina, E. (2009) Repensando las revoluciones clásicas. Venezuela: IMMECA.

Molina, E. (2018) La filosofía política de Toni Negri. Andalucía: Atrapasueños.

Negri, A. y Hardt, M. (2002) Imperio. Barcelona: Paidós.

Negri, A. y Hardt, M. (2004) Multitud. Barcelona: Debate.

Negri, A. y Hardt, M. (2011) Commonwealth. Madrid: Akal.

Nye, J. (1990) Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York: Basic Books.

Ornelas, R., “La hegemonía mundial y su disputa”, Observatorio Latinoamericano de Geopolítica, 2010. Disponible en: http:// www.geopolitica.ws/document/ornelaspdf/(Consultado: 10 Noviembre 2019)

Tucídides. (2015) Historia de la Guerra del Peloponeso. Barcelona: Editorial Juventud.

Wallerstein, I. (2005) Análisis del sistema mundo. México: Siglo XXI.

Published

2020-04-16

How to Cite

Molina-Campano, E. (2020). The concept of hegemony in international relations: a criticism of Andreas Antoniades. International Journal of Political Thought, 14, 427–436. https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.4827

Issue

Section

Estudios Varios