Freedom of movement, exclusion of immigrants, and the right to travel

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.7542

Keywords:

right to travel, right to exclude, migration, freedom of movement, open borders, ethics of migration

Abstract

Discussions on human mobility tend to focus on migration as settlement, ignoring travel and short-term stays. The objective of this article is twofold. The first has to do with the need to distinguish both phenomena. To this end, it proposes to conceive of travel as conceptually and normatively separate from migration. With this distinction in mind, the second objective is to defend the right to travel, based on the instrumental and intrinsic value of freedom of movement. Once we understand mobility as the norm, we will be in a position to establish the exceptions that delimit its exercise. We then proceed to examine the arguments in favor of migration controls, concluding that they do not stand up against the right to travel. The article responds to two additional objections: that of the unauthorized extension of the stay as a form of concealed migration, and that of the arbitrariness in the distinction between short- and long-term travel. Finally, we consider some situations in which the right to travel could be legitimately restricted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauböck, R. (2009). “Global Justice, Freedom of Movement and Democratic Citizenship”, European Journal of Sociology, vol. 50, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000397560900040X

Blake, M. (2001). “Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 30, n.º 3, 257-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00257.x

Blake, M. (2005). “Immigration”, en Frey, R. G. y Wellman C. H. (eds.), A companion to applied ethics, Malden, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 224-237.

Blake, M. (2013). “Immigration, jurisdiction, and exclusion”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 41, n.º 2, 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12012

Blake, M. (2014). “The right to exclude”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 17, n.º 5, 521-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2014.919056

Carens, J. (2013). The ethics of immigration, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.

Cole, P. (2000). Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration, Edimburgo, Edinburgh University Press.

Department of Homeland Security (2020). Fiscal year 2019 entry/exit overstay report. Recuperado el 20 de mayo de 2022 de: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2021-12/CBP%20-%20FY%202020%20Entry%20Exit%20Overstay%20Report_0.pdf

Fine, S. (2010). “Freedom of Association Is Not the Answer”, Ethics, vol. 120, n.º 2, 338-356. https://doi.org/10.1086/649626

Fine, S. (2013). “The Ethics of Immigration: Self-Determination and the Right to Exclude”, Philosophy Compass, vol. 8, n.º 3, 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12019

Hidalgo, J. (2019). Unjust Borders: Individuals and the Ethics of Immigration, Nueva York, Routledge.

Huemer, M. (2010). “Is there a right to immigrate?”, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 36, n.º 3, 429-461. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201036323

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2019). Cuenta Satélite del Turismo de España (CSTE). Revisión estadística 2019. Recuperado el 20 de mayo de 2022 de: https://www.ine.es/prensa/cst_2018.pdf

Kant, I. (1998). Sobre la paz perpetua, Madrid, Editorial Tecnos.

Kukathas, C. (2021). Immigration and Freedom, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Lægaard, S. (2010). “What is the Right to Exclude Immigrants?”, Res Publica, vol. 16, n.º 3, 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-010-9122-2

Lenzen, M. et al. (2013). “The carbon footprint of global tourism”, Nature Climate Change, vol. 8, n.º 6, 522-528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x

Loewe, D. (2020a). “Cuando la libertad importa: inmigrantes y movilidad libre”, Estudios Públicos, n.º 157, 7-46. https://doi.org/10.38178/cep.vi157.3

Loewe, D. (2020b). “Cuestionando la relación entre libertad de asociación y el derecho de excluir a los inmigrantes: tres argumentos en contra de la tesis de Ch. H. Wellman”, Bajo Palabra, n.º 23, 187-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.15366/bp.2020.23.007

Miller, D. (2016). Strangers in our midst. The political philosophy of immigration, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Nagel, T. (2005). “The Problem of Global Justice”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 33, n.º 2, 113-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00027.x

Nine, C. (2019). “Do territorial rights include the right to exclude?”, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 18, n.º 4, 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X18788345

Niño Arnaiz, B. (2021). “Mugak, harresiak eta giza mugikortasuna: marko teoriko-normatiboa”, Inguruak. Revista Vasca de Sociología y Ciencia Política, n.º 71, 50-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.18543/inguruak-71-2021-art04

Niño Arnaiz, B. (2022a). “Ética de las migraciones, fronteras y movilidad humana”, Oxímora. Revista Internacional de Ética y Política, n.º 21, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1344/oxi.2022.i21.39374

Niño Arnaiz, B. (2022b). “Should we open borders? Yes, but not in the name of global justice”, Ethics & Global Politics, vol. 15, n.º 2, 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2022.2081398

Oberman, K. (2016). “Immigration as a Human Right”, en Fine, S. & Ypi, L. (eds.), Migration in Political Theory. The ethics of movement and membership, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 32-56.

Organización Internacional para las Migraciones (2020). Informe sobre las migraciones en el mundo en 2020. Recuperado el 20 de mayo de 2022 de: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020_ es.pdf

Organización Mundial del Turismo (s.f.). Glosario de términos de turismo. Recuperado el 20 de mayo de 2022 de: https://www.unwto.org/es/glosario-terminos-turisticos

Pevnick, R. (2011). Immigration and the Constraints of Justice: Between Open Borders and Absolut Sovereignty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Sager, A. (2016). “Methodological Nationalism, Migration and Political Theory”, Political Studies, vol. 64, n.º 1, 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12167

Sager, A. (2018). Toward a Cosmopolitan Ethics of Mobility: The Migrant’s-Eye View of the World, Cham, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65759-2

Sandelind, C. (2015). “Territorial rights and open borders”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 18, n.º 5, 487-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2013.864796

Sheller, M. (2018). Mobility justice: The politics of movement in the age of extremes, Londres, Verso.

Song, S. (2018). “Political Theories of Migration”, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 21, 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-082317-093019

Song, S. (2019). Immigration and Democracy, Nueva York, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190909222.001.0001

Torpey, J. (2006). “Yendo y viniendo: la monopolización estatal de los legítimos ‘medios de movimiento’”, Zona abierta, n.º 116-117, 59-88.

Velasco, J. C. (2012). “Fronteras abiertas, derechos humanos y justicia global”, ARBOR. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, vol. 188, n.º 755, 457-473. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2012.755n3001

Walzer, M. (1993). Las esferas de la justicia. Una defensa del pluralismo y la igualdad, Ciudad de México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Wellman, C. H. y Cole, P. (2011). Debating the ethics of immigration: Is there a right to exclude? Nueva York, Oxford University Press.

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Niño Arnaiz, B. (2022). Freedom of movement, exclusion of immigrants, and the right to travel. International Journal of Political Thought, 17(1), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.7542

Issue

Section

Estudios Varios