The role of cities in bridging the digital divide: A multilevel analysis of Latin American countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/rev.metodoscuant.econ.empresa.11295Keywords:
Digital gap, smart cities, Latin America, multilevel modelAbstract
This paper aims to analyze the explanatory factors of the digital development of cities in Latin America. It is based on the hypothesis that in recent years there have been significant changes in the technological development of cities over time, and that such changes are explained by variations in the characteristics of the cities, as well as the countries to which they belong. We estimate a multilevel model with three levels: time, city and country. Random effects are analyzed as an alternative to evaluate the evolution of such digital development over time. For this purpose, data is used in the period 2020-2023 from 27 cities belonging to 16 countries in the Latin American region. The results indicate that there is significant variation in digital development over time between cities and between countries. On the other hand, this evolution in digital development is mainly explained by the digital divide at the country level and by the urban policies implemented by cities.
Downloads
References
Albino, V., Umberto, B. & Dangelico, R. M. (2015): Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, and performance. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
Alderete, M.V. (2019a) ¿Qué factores influyen en la construcción de Ciudades Inteligentes? Un modelo multinivel con datos a nivel ciudades y países. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 41 (14), 71-89.
Alderete, M.V. (2019b). ¿Las ciudades inteligentes ayudan a combatir el desempleo? Un análisis multinivel. Estudios demográficos y urbanos, 34 (1), 43-70.
https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v34i1.1751
Alderete, M.V. (2022). Can small cities from developing countries be smart cities? The case of Argentina. Theoretical and empirical researches in urban management- TERUM journal, 17(4), 36-51.
Anthopoulos, L. & Fitsilis, P. (2010). From Digital to Ubiquitous Cities: Defining a Common Architecture for Urban Development. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Environments IE10, Malasia, IEEE, pp. 301-306.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IE.2010.61
Belissent, J. & Giron, F. (2013). Service Providers Accelerate Smart City Projects. Forrester Research Report, Cambridge, Forrester Publication.
Caragliu, A., & Del Bo, C. F. (2023). Smart cities and the urban digital divide. Urban Sustainability, 43, 3(1), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-023-00117-w
Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C. & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18 (2), 65-82.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
CEPAL (2023). La Sociedad digital en América Latina. Informe publicado en https://www.fundaciontelefonica.com.pe/cultura-digital/publicaciones/sociedad-digital-en-america-latina-2023/791/
Cui, S., Li, G., & Liu, J. (2024). Can the construction of smart cities promote the capital allocation efficiency: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208, 123677.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123677
De La Cruz, F. (2008). Modelos Multinivel. Revista Peruana de Epidemiologia, 12 (3), 1-8.
Diez Roux, A. (2002). A glossary for multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 588-594.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.8.588
Furuholt, B. & Kristiansen, S. (2007). A rural-urban digital divide? Regional aspects of internet use in Tanzania. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 31(6), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2007.tb00215.x
González Chmielewski, D. y Peralta, A. (2024). Transformación pública digital: la agenda municipal Documento de políticas públicas #246. Programa de estado y gobierno. Buenos Aires: CIPPEC. https://www.cippec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/DPP-246-EyG-Transformacion-publica-digital-la-agenda-municipal-07.24.pdf
Hair Jr, J. F., & Fávero, L. P. (2019). Multilevel modeling for longitudinal data: concepts and applications. RAUSP Management Journal, 54, 459-489.
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2019-0059
Hargittai.E. (2003). The digital divide and what to do about it. In C. Jones (ed), New economy handbook, 821-39. New York: Elsevier.
Heeks, R. (2009). The ICT4D 2.0 manifesto: where next for ICTs and international development? Institute for Development Policy and Management, Manchester.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3477369
Hollands, R.G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12(3), 303-320.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604118
IESE Business School (2023). Índice IESE Cities in Motion 2023.
IESE Business School (2022). Índice IESE Cities in Motion 2022.
IESE Business School (2020). Índice IESE Cities in Motion 2020.
ITU (2017) Measuring the Information Society Report: Volume 2, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva.
Joia, L. A., & Kuhl, A. (2019). Smart city for development: A conceptual model for developing countries. International conference on social implications of computers in developing countries (pp. 203-214). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_17
Katz, R. (2012). Banda ancha, digitalización y desarrollo en América Latina. Conectados a la banda ancha: tecnología, políticas e impacto en América Latina y España (LC/W.495), E. F. Rojas (ed.), Santiago, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Khan, M. L., Welser, H. T., Cisneros, C., Manatong, G. & Idris, I. K. (2020). Digital inequality in the Appalachian Ohio: understanding how demographics, internet access, and skills can shape vital information use (VIU). Telematics & Informatics 50, 101380.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101380
Martins, H. C., & Terra, P. R. S. (2015). Maturidade do endividamento, desenvolvimento financeiro e instituições legais: Análise multinível em empresas latino-americanas [Debt maturity, financial development and legal institutions: a multilevel analysis in Latin American companies]. Revista de Administração, 50, 381-394.
https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1207
Mattoni, B., Gugliermetti, F., & Bisegna, F. (2015). A multilevel method to assess and design the renovation and integration of Smart Cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 15, 105-119.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.002
Mwesige, P. (2004). Cyber elites: A survey of internet café user in Uganda. Telematics and Informatics, 21(1), 83-101.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00024-8
Nam, T. & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy and context. ICEGOV2011, 26-28 de septiembre, Tallinn.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072100
OCDE (2003): PISA 2003. Manual de análisis de datos, Madrid, OCDE.
Paskaleva, K. A. (2009). Enabling the smart city: the progress of city e-governance in Europe. International Journal of Innovation and regional development, 1(4), 405-422.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022730
Rao, S. (2005). Bridging digital divide: Efforts in India. Telematics and Informatics, 22(4), 361-375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2005.01.007
Raudenbush, S. & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. 2 ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Productivity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 324-335.
https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.2.324
Song, Z., Wang, C. & Bergmann, L. (2020). China's prefectural digital divide: spatial analysis and multivariate determinants of ICT diffusion. International journal of information management. 52, 102072.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102072
Van Deursen, A.J.A.M. & Van Dijk. J.A.G.M. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21 (2), 354-375.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
Van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221-235.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
Vicente, M. R. & López, A. J. (2011). Assessing the regional digital divide across the European Union-27. Telecommunicaton Policy 35, 220-237.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.013
Wang, D., Zhou, T., & Wang, M. (2021). Information and communication technology (ICT), digital divide and urbanization: Evidence from Chinese cities. Technology in Society, 64, 101516.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101516
Winters, J. V. (2011). Why are Smart cities growing: who moves and who stays. Journal of Regional Science, 51 (2), 253-270.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00693.x
Yue, A., Mao, C., Wang, Z., Peng, W., & Zhao, S. (2024). Finding the pioneers of China's smart cities: From the perspective of construction efficiency and construction performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 204, 123410.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 María Verónica Alderete

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of manuscripts implies that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and that, in case of acceptance, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the Journal for its publication and dissemination. Authors retain the authors' right to use and share the article according to a personal or instutional use or scholarly sharing purposes; in addition, they retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
All the articles are published in the Journal under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA (Attribution-ShareAlike). It is allowed a commercial use of the work (always including the author attribution) and other derivative works, which must be released under the same license as the original work.
Up to Volume 21, this Journal has been licensing the articles under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 3.0 ES. Starting from Volume 22, the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0 is used.



