Smartdemocracy
la inteligencia artificial sumada a la democracia cognitiva como una alternativa radicalmente participativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.12880Palabras clave:
Democracia inteligente, democracia cognitiva, epistocracia, inteligencia artificial, legitimidad, autoridad, diseño constitucional, XAI, derechos digitalesResumen
Las democracias liberales enfrentan una crisis de legitimidad evidenciada en déficits epistémicos, funcionales y procedimentales. Este artículo propone como solución la SmartDemocracy o Democracia Cognitiva Inteligente (DCI), modelo constitucional que reconcilia igualdad política, competencia epistémica y eficacia funcional mediante una arquitectura tricameral: Cámara Popular (sufragio universal), Cámara Cognitiva (credenciales temporales por mérito/ afectación/ experiencia), y una Cámara Sintética (Inteligencia Artificial explicable XAI) bajo supervisión ciudadana. El Ejecutivo Tricéfalo Algorítmico implementa Pactos de Ejecución Programables con indicadores verificables y cláusulas sunset automáticas. Cinco prohibiciones absolutas previenen la degeneración tecnocrática. La DCI pretende superar a la epistemocracia restrictiva y a la democracia representativa tradicional, institucionalizando un conocimiento bajo control democrático permanente mediante la explicabilidad obligatoria de la IA y auditorías críticas independientes.
Descargas
Citas
Bell, D. A. (2015). The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400865505
Boucher, S., Hallin, A., Paulson, G., Dukát, M., Rask, M., & Shin, B. (2020). Collective intelligence, democracy, and governance: Handbook. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Brennan, J. (2016). Against democracy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882939
Buhmann, A., & Fieseler, C. (2023). Deep learning meets deep democracy: Deliberative governance and responsible innovation in artificial intelligence. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(1), 146-179. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.42
Canale, D. (2022). Cuando los expertos crean derecho: deferencia, opacidad y legitimidad. Discusiones, 30, 37-60. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2023.3404
Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828821
Centola, D. (2022). Network science of collective intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(11), 923-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.009
Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267-473. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123411
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.
Duberry, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence and democracy: Risks and promises of AI-mediated citizen-government relations. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977319
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law's empire. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831548
Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2021). The European legislation on AI: A brief analysis of its philosophical approach. Philosophy & Technology, 34(2), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00460-9
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029001002
Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564-581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001
Hildebrandt, M. (2015). Smart technologies and the end(s) of law: Novel entanglements of law and technology. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849808774
Hsiao, Y.-T., Lin, S.-Y., Tang, A., Narayanan, D., & Sarahe, C. (2018). vTaiwan: An empirical study of open consultation process in Taiwan. SocArXiv. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/xyhft_v1 https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xyhft
Jefferson, T. (1982). Notes on the State of Virginia (W. Peden, Ed.). University of North Carolina Press. (Obra original publicada en 1785).
Jefferson, T. (1984). First inaugural address. In M. D. Peterson (Ed.), Thomas Jefferson: Writings (pp. 492-496). Library of America. (Original work published 1801).
Kant, I. (1996). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? En M. J. Gregor (Ed. y Trad.), Practical philosophy (pp. 15-22). Cambridge University Press. (Obra original publicada en 1784).
King, L. A. (2003). Deliberation, legitimacy, and multilateral democracy. Governance, 16(1), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.t01-1-00203
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). Verso.
Lafont, C. (2015). Deliberation, participation, and democratic legitimacy: Should deliberative mini-publics shape public policy? Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12031
Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without shortcuts: A participatory conception of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198848189.001.0001
Lalley, S. P., & Weyl, E. G. (2018). Quadratic Voting: How Mechanism Design Can Radicalize Democracy. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181002
Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic reason: Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691155654.001.0001
Landemore, H. (2020). Open democracy: Reinventing popular rule for the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691181998.001.0001
Landemore, H., & Brennan, J. (2020). Debating democracy: Do we need more or less? Oxford University Press.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Crown Publishers.
Liang, F., Das, V., Kostyuk, N., & Hussain, M. M. (2018). Constructing a Data-Driven Society: China's Social Credit System as a State Surveillance Infrastructure. Policy & Internet, 10(4), 415-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.183
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2012). Estlund on epistocracy: A critique. Res Publica, 18, 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-012-9179-1
Madison, J. (2003). The Federalist No. 51. En A. Hamilton, J. Madison, & J. Jay, The Federalist Papers (pp. 318-322). Bantam Dell. (Obra original publicada en 1788).
Menendez-Blanco, M., & Bjørn, P. (2022). Designing digital participatory budgeting platforms: Urban biking activism in Madrid. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 31(4), 567-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09443-6
Mill, J. S. (1991). Considerations on representative government. Prometheus Books. (Obra original publicada en 1861).
Mill, J. S. (1991). Considerations on representative government. Prometheus Books. (Obra original publicada en 1861)
Mladenovi‐, I. (2020). Democracy, truth, and epistemic proceduralism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 20(59), 171-182.
Moats, D., Tang, A., & Chiu, J. (2024). Digital democracy in Taiwan: vTaiwan and the Pol.is platform. Technology in Society, 68, 101-115.
Montesquieu, C. L. (1995). Del espíritu de las leyes (M. Blázquez y P. de Vega, Trads.). Tecnos. (Obra original publicada en 1748).
Moraro, P. (2018). Against epistocracy. Social Theory and Practice, 44(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract20185835
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs.
Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. Verso.
Noveck, B. S. (2015). Smart citizens, smarter state: The technologies of expertise and the future of governing. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674915435
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishers.
Paine, T. (1986). Common sense. Penguin Books. (Original work published 1776)
Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
Platón. (1992). La República (C. Eggers Lan, Trad.). Gredos. (Obra original publicada ca. 380 a.C.).
Rask, M., & Shin, B. (2024). Integrating paths: Enhancing deliberative democracy through collective intelligence insights. Societies, 14(270), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120270
Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism (Expanded ed.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1993)
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1971). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford University Press.
Roberts, I. (2023). How can collective intelligence enhance democracy? An investigation towards human-centred design principles for empowering people engaging with deliberative technologies [Tesis de maestría, Northeastern University London].
Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755835
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2019). Conformity: The power of social influences. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479896585.001.0001
Tocqueville, A. de. (2000). Democracy in America (H. C. Mansfield & D. Winthrop, Trads.). University of Chicago Press. (Obra original publicada en 1835-1840). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924564.001.0001
Veale, M., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2021). Demystifying the draft EU artificial intelligence act. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402
Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001
Warren, M. E., & Gastil, J. (2015). Can deliberative minipublics address the cognitive challenges of democratic citizenship? The Journal of Politics, 77(2), 562-574 https://doi.org/10.1086/680078
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Carlos Aguilar Blanc
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Política de acceso abierto
Se permite el acceso libre y abierto de cualquier interesado a todos los contenidos de los números de la revista, sin costo alguno, pudiendo imprimir y trasladar todos los artículos, con la única condición de precisar la fuente y la autoría.
La revista: a) no cobra a las autorías costes por el procesamiento de los artículos ni por el envío de los mismos, b) mantiene el copyright para los autores sin restricciones, c) facilita a los autores conservar sus derechos de publicación sin limitaciones.
La Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político es una obra original del Laboratorio de Ideas y Prácticas Políticas de la Universidad Pablo de Olavide. Todos los artículos incluidos en la Revista son obra original de sus respectivas autorías. Esta Revista se ofrece libremente a la comunidad científica y académica sin coste alguno y libera los contenidos de acuerdo a la licencia "Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 CC BY-NC-SA" del proyecto Creative Commons dispuesta en la siguiente url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
Si deseas traducir o compilar alguno de los artículos aquí disponibles, por favor, ponte en contacto
