Elementos para una economía política del republicanismo: un análisis crítico de la renta básica de Alaska

David Casassas; Jurgen de Wispelaere

doi:10.46661/revintpensampolit.1868

Authors

David Casassas Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
Jurgen de Wispelaere Université de Montréal, Canadá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.1868

Keywords:

basic income, republicanism, libertarianism, socio-economic independence, concentrations of economic power, democratic control

Abstract

In this article we present the basic ideas of republican political theory and demarcate the republican perspective from leftlibertarianism, which sees Alaska’s basic income model as its more natural and immediate institutional realization. We then address three sets of problems in the Alaska model: the lack of a substantial economic floor, the lack of limits on great accumulations of private economic power, and the lack of mechanisms of democratic control over the extraction, taxation and distribution of natural resources. For republicans to endorse the Alaska model, it will have to be modified extensively. We conclude that, while the Alaska model can be made compatible with the republican perspective in a weak sense, republicans should be cautious about defending the model in a strong sense.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerman B. y Alstott, A. (1999): The Stakeholder Society, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Arneson, R. (1995): «Against ‘Complex’ Equality», en D. Miller y M. Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arneson, R. (2010): «Self-Ownership and World Ownership: Against LeftLibertarianism», Social Philosophy & Policy, 27(1), pp. 168-194.

Barry, B. (1995): «Spherical Justice and Global Injustice», en D. Miller y M. Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barry, B. (2005): Why Social Justice Matters, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beard, C.A. y Beard, M.R. (1939): America in Midpassage, Nueva York: Macmillan.

Birnbaum, S. y Casassas, D. (2008): «Social Republicanism and Basic Income», en D. Leighton y S. White (eds.), Building a Citizen Society: The Emerging Politics of Republican Democracy, Londres: Lawrence & Wishart.

Bollier, D. (2006): «Using Stakeholder Trusts to Reclaim Common Assets», en W. Paxton y S. White (eds.), The Citizen’s Stake: Exploring the Future of Universal Asset Policies, Bristol: Policy Press.

Carter, I. (2012): «Left-libertarianism and the Resource Dividend», en K. Widerquist y M.Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Carter, I., Kramer, M. y Steiner, H. (eds.) (2007): Freedom: A Philosophical Anthology, Oxford: Blackwell.

Casassas, D. (2007): «Basic Income and the Republican Ideal: Rethinking Material Independence in Contemporary Societies», Basic Income Studies, 2(2), pp. 1-7.

Casassas, D. (2010): La ciudad en llamas. La vigencia del republicanismo comercial de Adam Smith, Barcelona: Montesinos.

Cohen, G.A. (1995): Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Daniels, N. (1989): «Equal Liberty and Unequal Worth of Liberty», en N. Daniels (ed.), Reading Rawls, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Domènech, A. y Raventós, D. (2007): «Property and Republican Freedom: An Institutional Approach to Basic Income», Basic Income Studies, 2(2), pp. 1-8.

Dowding, K., De Wispelaere, J. y White, S. (2003): «Stakeholding. A New Paradigm in Social Policy», en K. Dowding, J. De Wispelaere y S. White (eds.), The Ethics of Stakeholding, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990): The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fama, E.F. y M.C. Jensen (1983): «Separation of Ownership and Control», Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 301-325.

Frank, R. y Cook, P.J. (1995): The Winner-Take-All Society. Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More Than the Rest of Us, New York: Free Press.

Freeman, S. (2001): «Illiberal Libertarians: Why Libertarianism Is Not a Liberal View», Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30(2), pp. 105–151.

Goldsmith, S. (2005): «The Alaska Permanent Fund: An Experiment in Wealth Distribution», en G. Standing (ed.), Promoting Income Security as a Right. Europe and North America, Londres: Anthem Press.

Goldsmith, S. (2012): «The Economic and Social Impacts of the Permanent Fund Dividend on Alaska», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Goodhart, M. (2007): «None So Poor that He is Compelled to Sell Himself: Democracy, Subsistence and Basic Income», en S. Hertel y L. Minkler (eds.), Economic Rights: Conceptual, Measurement and Policy Issues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grey, T . (1980): «The Disintegration of Property», en J.R. Pennock y J.W. Chapman (eds.), NOMOS XXII: Property, Nueva York: New York University Press.

Griffin, C. (2012): «Stakeholding Through the Permanent Fund Dividend: Fitting Practice to Theory», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Haagh, L. (2011): «Basic Income, Social Democracy and Control over Time», Policy & Politics, 39(1), pp. 43-66.

Harrington, J. (1992) [1656]: The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics, ed. a cargo de J.G.A. Pocock, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Howard, M. (2012): «A Cap on Carbon and a Basic Income: A Defensible Combination in the U.S.?», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Meade, J (1964): Efficiency, Equality and the Ownership of Property, Londres: Allen Unwin.

Murray, C. (2006): In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State, Washington D.C.: AEI Press.

Nozick, R. (1974): Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell.

Otsuka, M. (2003): Libertarianism Without Inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Paine, T. (1997) [1797]: «Agrarian Justice», en B. Kuklick (ed.), Thomas Paine: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pettit, P. (1993): The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics, Nueva York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Pettit, P. (1997): Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Pettit, P. (1999): «Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratization», en

I. Shapiro y C.Hacker-Cordón (eds.), Democracy’s Value, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pettit, P. (2000): «Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory», Nomos, 42, pp. 105-44.

Pettit, P. (2001): A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pettit, P. (2003): «Agency-freedom and Option-freedom», Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(4), pp. 387-403.

Pettit, P. (2006): «Freedom in the Market», Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 5(2), pp. 131-149.

Pettit, P. (2008): «Three Conceptions of Democratic Control», Constellations, 15(1), pp. 46-55.

Pettit, P. (2009): «Varieties of Public Representation», en I. Shapiro et al. (eds.), Political Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Raventós, D. (2007): Basic Income: The Material Conditions of Freedom, Londres: Pluto Press.

Raventós, D. y Casassas, D. (2004): «La Renta Básica y el poder de negociación de ‘los que viven con permiso de otros’», Revista Internacional de Sociología, 34.

Rawls, J. (1993): Political Liberalism, Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Rawls, J. (1999) [1971]: A Theory of Justice (edición revisada), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rousseau, J.J. (2010) [1754]: Discurso sobre el origen y los fundamentos de la desigualdad entre los hombres y otros escritos, Madrid: Tecnos.

Skinner, Q. (1992): «On Justice, the Common Good, and the Priority of Liberty», en C. Mouffe (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy. Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, Londres/N. York: Verso.

Skinner, Q. (1998): Liberty before Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sunstein, C. (1993): After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vallentyne, P. (2003): «Self-Ownership and Equality: Brute Luck, Gifts, Universal Dominance and Leximin», en A. Reeve y A. Williams (eds.), Real Libertarianism Assessed, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Vanderborght, Y. y Van Parijs, P. (2005) : L’allocation universelle, París: La Découverte.

Van Donselaar, G. (2008): The Right to Exploit, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Van Parijs, P. (1995): Real Freedom for All: What (if anything) Can Justify Capitalism?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Waldron, J. (1988): The Right to Private Property, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Walzer, M. (1983): Spheres of Justice, Nueva York: Basic Books.

White, S. (2011): «Basic Income versus Basic Capital: Can We Resolve the Disagreement?»,Policy and Politics, 39 (1), pp. 67-81.

Widerquist, K. (2012): «Citizens Capital Accounts», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Widerquist, K. y Howard, M. (eds.) (2012a): Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Widerquist, K. y Howard, M. (2012b): «Introduction: Success in Alaska», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Winter, S. (2012): «Climate Change, Complicity, and Compensation», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Wolff, J. (1991): Robert Nozick: Property, Justice and the Minimal State, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Wright, E.O. (2006): «Basic Income as a Socialist Project», Basic Income Studies, 1(1), pp. 1-11.

Towards a political economy of republicanism: A critical assessment of alaska’s basic income scheme

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Downloads

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Make a Submission

Language

esci

fecyt

index

Information

Current Issue