Elementos para una economía política del republicanismo: un análisis crítico de la renta básica de Alaska

Autores/as

  • David Casassas Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
  • Jurgen de Wispelaere Université de Montréal, Canadá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.1868

Palabras clave:

control democrático, renta básica, concentraciones de poder económico, , independencia socioeconómica, libertarianismo, republicanismo

Resumen

En este artículo presentamos las ideas básicas que subyacen a la teoría política republicana y establecemos una línea de demarcación entre la perspectiva republicana y el libertarianismo de izquierdas, el cual tiene en la renta básica de Alaska su plasmación institucional más natural e inmediata. A partir de ahí, abordamos tres conjuntos de problemas que presenta el modelo de Alaska: la falta de una base económica sustancial, la falta de frenos a la acumulación de poder económico privado y la falta de mecanismos de control democrático sobre los procesos de extracción, imposición tributaria y distribución de los recursos naturales. Así, para que el republicanismo pueda hacerlo suyo, el modelo de Alaska debe ser sometido a importantes enmiendas y modificaciones que tienen que ver tanto con su naturaleza intrínseca como con el contexto institucional en el que opera. De este modo, concluimos sosteniendo que, aun cuando el modelo de Alaska puede ser compatible con la perspectiva republicana en un sentido débil, los republicanos deben proceder con cautela a la hora de defender el modelo en un sentido fuerte.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Ackerman B. y Alstott, A. (1999): The Stakeholder Society, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Arneson, R. (1995): «Against ‘Complex’ Equality», en D. Miller y M. Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198280084.003.0011

Arneson, R. (2010): «Self-Ownership and World Ownership: Against LeftLibertarianism», Social Philosophy & Policy, 27(1), pp. 168-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990070

Barry, B. (1995): «Spherical Justice and Global Injustice», en D. Miller y M. Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198280084.003.0004

Barry, B. (2005): Why Social Justice Matters, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beard, C.A. y Beard, M.R. (1939): America in Midpassage, Nueva York: Macmillan.

Birnbaum, S. y Casassas, D. (2008): «Social Republicanism and Basic Income», en D. Leighton y S. White (eds.), Building a Citizen Society: The Emerging Politics of Republican Democracy, Londres: Lawrence & Wishart.

Bollier, D. (2006): «Using Stakeholder Trusts to Reclaim Common Assets», en W. Paxton y S. White (eds.), The Citizen’s Stake: Exploring the Future of Universal Asset Policies, Bristol: Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781847421463.004

Carter, I. (2012): «Left-libertarianism and the Resource Dividend», en K. Widerquist y M.Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015020_9

Carter, I., Kramer, M. y Steiner, H. (eds.) (2007): Freedom: A Philosophical Anthology, Oxford: Blackwell.

Casassas, D. (2007): «Basic Income and the Republican Ideal: Rethinking Material Independence in Contemporary Societies», Basic Income Studies, 2(2), pp. 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1081

Casassas, D. (2010): La ciudad en llamas. La vigencia del republicanismo comercial de Adam Smith, Barcelona: Montesinos.

Cohen, G.A. (1995): Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521270

Daniels, N. (1989): «Equal Liberty and Unequal Worth of Liberty», en N. Daniels (ed.), Reading Rawls, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Domènech, A. y Raventós, D. (2007): «Property and Republican Freedom: An Institutional Approach to Basic Income», Basic Income Studies, 2(2), pp. 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1090

Dowding, K., De Wispelaere, J. y White, S. (2003): «Stakeholding. A New Paradigm in Social Policy», en K. Dowding, J. De Wispelaere y S. White (eds.), The Ethics of Stakeholding, Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522916

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990): The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879100100108

Fama, E.F. y M.C. Jensen (1983): «Separation of Ownership and Control», Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 301-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

Frank, R. y Cook, P.J. (1995): The Winner-Take-All Society. Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More Than the Rest of Us, New York: Free Press.

Freeman, S. (2001): «Illiberal Libertarians: Why Libertarianism Is Not a Liberal View», Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30(2), pp. 105–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00105.x

Goldsmith, S. (2005): «The Alaska Permanent Fund: An Experiment in Wealth Distribution», en G. Standing (ed.), Promoting Income Security as a Right. Europe and North America, Londres: Anthem Press.

Goldsmith, S. (2012): «The Economic and Social Impacts of the Permanent Fund Dividend on Alaska», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015020_4

Goodhart, M. (2007): «None So Poor that He is Compelled to Sell Himself: Democracy, Subsistence and Basic Income», en S. Hertel y L. Minkler (eds.), Economic Rights: Conceptual, Measurement and Policy Issues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511257.005

Grey, T . (1980): «The Disintegration of Property», en J.R. Pennock y J.W. Chapman (eds.), NOMOS XXII: Property, Nueva York: New York University Press.

Griffin, C. (2012): «Stakeholding Through the Permanent Fund Dividend: Fitting Practice to Theory», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015020_11

Haagh, L. (2011): «Basic Income, Social Democracy and Control over Time», Policy & Politics, 39(1), pp. 43-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557311X546316

Harrington, J. (1992) [1656]: The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics, ed. a cargo de J.G.A. Pocock, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139137126

Howard, M. (2012): «A Cap on Carbon and a Basic Income: A Defensible Combination in the U.S.?», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Meade, J (1964): Efficiency, Equality and the Ownership of Property, Londres: Allen Unwin.

Murray, C. (2006): In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State, Washington D.C.: AEI Press.

Nozick, R. (1974): Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell.

Otsuka, M. (2003): Libertarianism Without Inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199243956.001.0001

Paine, T. (1997) [1797]: «Agrarian Justice», en B. Kuklick (ed.), Thomas Paine: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pettit, P. (1993): The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics, Nueva York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Pettit, P. (1997): Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Pettit, P. (1999): «Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratization», en

I. Shapiro y C.Hacker-Cordón (eds.), Democracy’s Value, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pettit, P. (2000): «Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory», Nomos, 42, pp. 105-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814786628.003.0009

Pettit, P. (2001): A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pettit, P. (2003): «Agency-freedom and Option-freedom», Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(4), pp. 387-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803154003

Pettit, P. (2006): «Freedom in the Market», Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 5(2), pp. 131-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X06064218

Pettit, P. (2008): «Three Conceptions of Democratic Control», Constellations, 15(1), pp. 46-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2008.00473.x

Pettit, P. (2009): «Varieties of Public Representation», en I. Shapiro et al. (eds.), Political Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813146.005

Raventós, D. (2007): Basic Income: The Material Conditions of Freedom, Londres: Pluto Press.

Raventós, D. y Casassas, D. (2004): «La Renta Básica y el poder de negociación de ‘los que viven con permiso de otros’», Revista Internacional de Sociología, 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2003.i34.291

Rawls, J. (1993): Political Liberalism, Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Rawls, J. (1999) [1971]: A Theory of Justice (edición revisada), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rousseau, J.J. (2010) [1754]: Discurso sobre el origen y los fundamentos de la desigualdad entre los hombres y otros escritos, Madrid: Tecnos.

Skinner, Q. (1992): «On Justice, the Common Good, and the Priority of Liberty», en C. Mouffe (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy. Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, Londres/N. York: Verso.

Skinner, Q. (1998): Liberty before Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171274

Sunstein, C. (1993): After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vallentyne, P. (2003): «Self-Ownership and Equality: Brute Luck, Gifts, Universal Dominance and Leximin», en A. Reeve y A. Williams (eds.), Real Libertarianism Assessed, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Vanderborght, Y. y Van Parijs, P. (2005) : L’allocation universelle, París: La Découverte. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.vande.2005.01

Van Donselaar, G. (2008): The Right to Exploit, Nueva York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195140392.001.0001

Van Parijs, P. (1995): Real Freedom for All: What (if anything) Can Justify Capitalism?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Waldron, J. (1988): The Right to Private Property, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Walzer, M. (1983): Spheres of Justice, Nueva York: Basic Books.

White, S. (2011): «Basic Income versus Basic Capital: Can We Resolve the Disagreement?»,Policy and Politics, 39 (1), pp. 67-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557311X546325

Widerquist, K. (2012): «Citizens Capital Accounts», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Widerquist, K. y Howard, M. (eds.) (2012a): Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Widerquist, K. y Howard, M. (2012b): «Introduction: Success in Alaska», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015020

Winter, S. (2012): «Climate Change, Complicity, and Compensation», en K. Widerquist y M. Howard (eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its Suitability as a Model, Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015020_13

Wolff, J. (1991): Robert Nozick: Property, Justice and the Minimal State, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Wright, E.O. (2006): «Basic Income as a Socialist Project», Basic Income Studies, 1(1), pp. 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1008

Descargas

Publicado

2016-03-17

Cómo citar

Casassas, D., & de Wispelaere, J. (2016). Elementos para una economía política del republicanismo: un análisis crítico de la renta básica de Alaska. Revista Internacional De Pensamiento Político, 6, 165–192. https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.1868

Número

Sección

Estudios