Rendimiento de aprendizaje de los estudiantes y aceptación de tecnologías web 2.0 basadas en propiedades de riqueza de medios

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4269

Palabras clave:

Tecnologías web 2.0, riqueza mediática, aceptación de usuario, rendimiento de aprendizaje, educación superior

Resumen

Es probable que la selección de un canal de comunicación para el desempeño de las tareas de aprendizaje afecte la forma en que la información y el conocimiento se pueden transmitir de manera efectiva. Basado en la teoría de la riqueza de los medios, este estudio empleó un diseño cuasiexperimental para examinar la influencia de las propiedades de la riqueza de los medios en el rendimiento del aprendizaje y la aceptación del usuario de las tecnologías web 2.0 como herramientas de aprendizaje. El cuasi-experimento, que tuvo lugar durante ocho semanas, se llevó a cabo con 100 estudiantes de pregrado que fueron asignados a dos grupos experimentales (condición de aprendizaje basada en Facebook y condición de aprendizaje basada en Blogger) y un grupo de control (condición de aprendizaje basada en papel). También se realizó una discusión de grupo focal para revelar las ideas de los participantes después de usar las tecnologías web 2.0 en la realización de las actividades de aprendizaje asignadas. No existieron diferencias significativas entre las tres condiciones de aprendizaje en términos de rendimiento de aprendizaje y entre las dos condiciones experimentales con respecto a la aceptación del usuario. Tales hallazgos indican que el rendimiento de aprendizaje alcanzado al usar las herramientas de aprendizaje se percibió como el mismo, independientemente de las características que ofrecían. Todos los grupos también pueden tener el mismo nivel percibido de utilidad y facilidad de uso que ofrecen los medios de aprendizaje a pesar de las variaciones en sus características.

 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Balaji, M.S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from ‘media richness theory’ perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 1-22.

Basu, A., O’Steen, B., & Allan, M. (2011). Integrating medical education with medical practice: Role of web 2.0 tools. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ffdc/abd069f5acf2def67d5f7efb7a4e885f5e7f.pdf?_ga=2.84463193.1543746134.1561729369-1409743535.1561729369

Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2008). Do media richness and visual anonymity influence learning? A comparative study using Skype™. Proceeding of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research, 18-25.

Bradley, J. (2009). The Technology Acceptance Model and Other User Acceptance Theories. Retrieved from http://biblio.uabcs.mx/html/libros/pdf/11/15.pdf

Chuang, T., Bernard, M., & Ali, S.I. (2002). Computer-supported collaborative learning performance and satisfaction: A multi-stage study. Journal of International Information Management, 11(1), 27-41.

Cresswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1984). Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 191-233). Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a128980.pdf

Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H., & Trevino, L.K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly,11(3), 355-366.

Dao, D.V. (2015). Social media classification scheme in online teaching and learning activities: A consideration for educators. Interactional Journal of Education and Social Science, 2(4), 85-94.

Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319- 340.

Dennis, A.R. (2009). Media richness theory. In S.W. Littlejohn, & K.A. Foss, Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

DeSanctis, G., &Monge, P. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 693-703.

Gliner, J.A., Morgan, G.A., & Leech, Nancy L. (2009). Research methods in applied settings: An Integrated approach to design and analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Havard, B., Du, J., & Xu, J. (2008). Online collaborative learning and communication media. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(1), 37-50.

Heeren, E., & Lewis, R. (1997). Selecting communication media for distributed communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 85-98.

Hung, S-Y., Chen, C.C., Hung, H-M., & Ho., W-W. (2013). Critical factors predicting the acceptance of digital museums: User and system perspectives. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research,14(3), 231-243.

Karahanna, E., & Limayem, M. (2000). E-mail and v-mail usage: Generalizing across technologies. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 49-66.

Kishi, M. (2008). Perceptions and use of electronic media: Testing the relationship between organizational interpretation differences and media richness. Information & Management, 45(5), 281-287

Kitchakarn, O. (2016). How students perceived social media as a learning tool in enhancing their language learning performance. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 53-60.

Kock, N. (2005). Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward e-communication tools. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(2), 117-130. doi:10.1109/TPC.2005.849649

Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K. & Chen, Z. (2007). Understanding user acceptance of multimedia messaging services: An empirical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2066-2077.

Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009).Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computer& Education, 52(3), 599-607.

Newman, J.H. (2014). Enhanced teaching and learning in media richness and media synchronicity environments. Computer Science and Information Technology, 2(4), 189-191. doi:10.13189/csit.2014.020401

Roman, M., Popescu, D., & Selisteanu, D. (2013).An Interactive Teaching System for Bond Graph Modeling and Simulation in Bioengineering. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 17-31.

Saeed, N., Yang, Y., & Sinnappan, S. (2008). Media richness and user acceptance of Second Life. Proceedings of ASCILITE Conference, 851-860.

Saeed, N., Yang, Y., & Sinnappan, S. (2010) Impact of media richness on user acceptance of blogs and podcasts. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’10), Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from http://ims.mii.lt/ims/konferenciju_medziaga/ITiCSE'10/docs/p137.pdf

Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning — A critical review. Retrieved from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) website: http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/39458556.pdf

Soumplis, A., Koulocheri, E., Kostaras, N., Karousos, N., & Xenos, M. (2011).Learning management systems and learning 2.0. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 6(4), 1-18.

Sun, P.C., & Cheng, H.J. (2007). The design of instructional multimedia in e-Learning: A media richness theory-based approach. Computers & Education,49, 662–676. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.016

Tsadima, K. Vassilopoulou, K. Kavakli, E., & Sofianopoulou, C. (2012, July).Integrating media richness theory and learning styles: A proposed theoretical framework. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN12), Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from https://library.iated.org/view/TSADIMA2012INT

Witte, R.S., & Witte, J.S. (2001). Statistics (6th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.

Wong, K., Osman, R.B., Goh, P.S.C., & Rahmat, M.K. (2013).Understanding student teachers’ behavioural intention to use technology: Technology acceptance model (TAM) validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 89-104.

Wu, P.H., Hwang, G.J., & Tsai, W.H. (2013). An expert system-based context-aware ubiquitous learning approach for conducting science learning activities. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 217–230.

Yang, T.C., Hwang, G.-J., & Yang, S. J.H. (2013).Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students’ learning styles and cognitive styles. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 185–200.

Yussof, Y.M., Muhammad, Z., Zahari, M.S.M., Pasah, E.S., & Robert, E. (2009).Individual differences, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness in the e-library usage. Computer and Information Science, 2(1), 76-83.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-07-09

Cómo citar

Peñalba, E. (2020). Rendimiento de aprendizaje de los estudiantes y aceptación de tecnologías web 2.0 basadas en propiedades de riqueza de medios. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (14), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4269

Número

Sección

Artículos