Algunas reflexiones sobre ética judicial en el Reino Unido y en los Estados Unidos de América
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.12699Palabras clave:
principios de conducta judicial de Bangalore, ética judicial, Reino Unido, Estados UnidosResumen
Este artículo explora ciertos aspectos relevantes de la ética judicial de Reino Unido de la Gran Bretaña, en adelante Reino Unido (solo aplica a Inglaterra y Gales) y Estados Unidos de Norteamérica, en adelante Estados Unidos. Tras analizar los principios éticos generales que vinculan al poder judicial en estos dos países, se constata la existencia de un sustrato común de valores éticos y morales y una serie de contrastes en cuanto a los estándares de comportamiento de los jueces, reflejando diferentes tradiciones legales y marcos institucionales. La metodología empleada es el análisis documental, la revisión bibliográfica y con predominio de la metodología del derecho comparado.
Descargas
Citas
Abramson, L. W. (2000). “Appearance of impropriety: deciding when a judge`s impartiality might reasonably be questioned”, Georgetown, Journal of legal ethics, 14, pp. 56-102. Disponible en: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=996485
Act of Settlement (1700). Portal de Legislación de Reino Unido, 1-5. Disponible en: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Will3/12-13/2
Adams E. (2024). “The Judicial approach to the judicial discretion under s.4 HRA in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer [2024]”, UK Constitutional Law Association, pp. 1-8. Disponible en: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2024/10/28/elizabeth-adams-the-judicial-approach-to-the-judicial-discretion-under-s-4-hra-in-secretary-of-state-for-business-and-trade-v-mercer-2024-uksc-12/
Armstrong, W.P. (1972). “The Code of Judicial Conduct”, SMU Law review, 26(4), pp. 708-715. Disponible en: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol26/iss4/3
Bogdanor, V. (2009). “Human Rights and the New British Constitution”, Justice, pp. 1-18. Disponible en: https://files.justice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/06172430/Human-Rights-and-the-New-British-Constitution.pdf
Burbank, S. B. (2003). “¿What do we mean by judicial independence?”, Ohio State Law Journal, 64, pp. 323-339. Disponible en:
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1947&context=faculty_scholarship
Blick, A. (2011). “Judicial Power and Accountability in the UK.” Public Law, pp. 515-534.
Brand-Ballard, J. (2010). Limits of legality: the ethics of lawless judging, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.142-157.
Código de conducta para los jueces de la Corte Suprema Estados Unidos. (2023). Disponible en:
https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges 2-19.
Congressional Research Service (2023). “The Supreme Court adopts a Code of Conduct”, CRS Legal Sidebar, pp. 1-7. Disponible en:
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11078
Courts and Tribunals (2023). “History of the judiciary in England and Wales”, Overview of the judiciary, pp. 1-7: Disponible en: https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/history-of-the-judiciary-in-england-and-wales/history-of-the-judiciary/
Courts and Tribunals (2025). “The justice system / Judiciary”, p. 1. Disponible en: https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/our-justice-system/oaths/
Courts and Tribunals (2023). Guide to judicial conduct, pp. 8-26. Disponible en: https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/guide-to-judicial-conduct-revised-july-2023/
Courts and Tribunals (2023). Statement of expected behaviour, p.1. Disponible en: https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/statement-of-expected-behaviour/
Courts and Tribunals (2025). Artificial Intelligence, pp. 5-9. Disponible en: https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/artificial-intelligence-ai-judicial-guidance-2/
Craig, P. (2013). “Accountability and Judicial Review in the UK and EU: Central Precepts”, en Bamforth, N. y Leyland, P. Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution, Oxford: Oxford Academic, pp. 180-199. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670024.003.0008
Cravens, S. M. (2007). “In pursuit of actual justice”, Alabama Law Review, 59(1), pp. 5-28. Disponible en: https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2059/Issue%201/Cravens.pdf
Dennett, A. (2024). Public Law Directions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 298-323. Disponible en: https://www.oxfordlawtrove.com/view/10.1093/he/9780198903420.001.0001/he-9780198903420.
Duxbury, N. (2005). “English Jurisprudence: between Austin and Hart”, Virginia Law Review, 91(1), pp. 87-91.
De Montalvo Jääskelainen, F. (2009). “Ley de Reforma Constitucional del Reino Unido de 2005”, Revista de las Cortes Generales, 77, pp. 305-440. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.33426/rcg/2009/77/988
ENCJ, (2017). “Judges Council of England and Wales”, pp. 1-2. Disponible en: https://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/factsheets/judges_council_uk_england_and_wales.pdf
Forsyth, Ch. (2011). “Judges, bias and recusal in United Kingdom”, Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge University Press, (CUP), pp. 361-378.
Fox, L.J. y Martyn, S. (2009). “A century of Legal Ethics: Trial Lawyers and the ABA Canons of Professional Ethics”, American Bar Association, Section of Litigation, pp.123-150.
Frank, J. P. (1970). “Conflict of Interest and U. S. Supreme Court Justices.” The American Journal of Comparative Law, 18(4), pp. 744-761. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/839011
Freedman, M.H. (2004). “Duck-Blind Justice: Justice Scalia’s Memorandum in the Cheney Case”, Study of Legal Ethics, 229, pp. 229-235. Disponible en: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/43
Frost, A. (2013). “Judicial Ethics and Supreme Court Exceptionalism”, Georgetown journal of legal ethics, 26(3), pp. 449-455. Disponible en:
https://digitalcom9mons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1380
Garwin, A. (2004). Annotated Model Code of Judicial Conduct, ABA, Ed. Amer Maritain Assn Inc.
Gee, G.D. (2017). Judging the JAC: How Much Judicial Influence Over Judicial Appointments Is Too Much?, En Gee, G.D. y Rackley, E. (eds.). Debating Judicial Appointments in an Age of Diversity. Routledge, pp. 152-167.
Gee, G.D. Hazell, R. Malleson, K. O´Brien, P. (2015). The politics of judicial independence in the UK´s changing constitution, Cambridge University Press, Relations between judges and Parliament: pp. 92-125. The UK Supreme Court: pp. 194- 224. The new Lord Chancellors and the executive: pp. 31-63. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589223.011[Opens in a new window]
Geyh, CH. G. (2023). “Judicial Ethics and Discipline in the States”, State Court Report, pp. 1-2. Disponible en:
https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/judicial-ethics-and-discipline-states (24 de febrero de 2025)
Geyh, CH. G. (2013). “The dimensions of judicial impartiality”, Florida Law review, 65 (2), pp. 513-538. Disponible en: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1138&context=flr
Geyh, CH, G. (2010). “Reporter's Notes to the Model Code of Judicial Conduct”, (editado por Geyh Ch. G. y William H.), Books & Book Chapters, Maurer Faculty, p. 144. Disponible en: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facbooks/144
Geyh, CH, G. (2021). “The arquitecture of judicial ethics”, Penn Law Review, 169, pp. 2357-2367. Disponible en:
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9754&context=penn_law_review
Geyh, C. G. (2006). “When Courts and Congress Collide: The Struggle for Control of America’s Judicial System”. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 23-51.
Geyh, C. G. (2020). “Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law”, Washington, D.C: Federal Judicial Center, pp. 20-70.
Geyh, C. G. (2016). Courting Peril: The Political Transformation of the American Judiciary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 12-61.
Geyh, C. G. (2023). “Judicial ethics and identity”, The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 36, pp. 240-245. Disponible en:
Gimenez Gluck, D. (2014). “El gobierno del poder judicial y la separación de poderes en la nueva constitución británica”, UNED, Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, 34, p. 459.
Godar, B. (2024). “State Judicial Conduct Commissions: the challenge of judging judges”, University of Wisconsin Law School, pp. 7-18.
Goodhart, A. (1930). “Case Law in England and America”, Cornell Law Review, 15 (173), pp. 173-193.
Grant Hammond, R. (2009). Judicial recusal: principles, process and problems, Hart Publishing, pp. 11-14 y 55-68.
Gray, C. (2016). “So, You’re Going to Be a Judge: Ethical Issues for New Judges”, Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 52(2), pp. 80-89. Disponible en: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview/571
Gray, C. (1996). “A judge's attendance at social events, bar association functions, civic and charitable functions, and political gatherings”, Chicago: American Judicature Society, pp. 1-14. Disponible en: https://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/judicial/id/414/download
Gray, C. (1996). “Political activity by members of a judge's family”, Chicago: American Judicature Society, pp. 1-10. Disponible en:
https://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/judicial/id/414/download
Gray, C. (2004). “A Study of State Judicial Discipline Sanctions”, Chicago: American Judicature Society, pp. 3-26.
Gray, C. (2007). “How Judicial Conduct Commissions Work”, The Justice System Journal, 28(3), pp. 405-418.
Hall, J. (1958). “The Present Position of Jurisprudence in the United States”, artículos de Maurer Faculty, 1470, pp. 321-330. Disponible en:
https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1470
Hamer, K. (2023). Hamer’s Professional Conduct Casebook, Fourth Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 725–732. Doi: 10.1093/oso/9780192883384.003.0047
Hansard. (1803- 2005). Official Report of debates in Parliament, pp. 1-7. Disponible en: https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1830/may/25/sir-jonah-barrington
Hudson, J. (2012). The Oxford History of the Laws of England, II, Ch. XXXI, Magna Carta and the Common Law, Oxford University Press, pp. 1150-1180.
Johnson V.R. (2005). “Justice Tom C. Clark’s Legacy in the Field of Legal Ethics”, The Journal of the Legal Profession, pp. 33-70.
Judicial diversity and Inclusion Strategy, 2021-2025. Disponible en: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Judicial-Diversity-and-Inclusion-Strategy-2020-2025-v2.pdf
Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, (2025). p. 1. Disponible en: https://www.complaints.judicialconduct.gov.uk/
Judicial Conference, (1973). “Report of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States”, en el Portal US Gov., pp. 2-29. Disponible en: https://www.uscourts.gov/file/1619/download
Kavanagh, A. (2018). “El papel de los jueces en el marco de una carta de derechos; una teoría de la contención judicial”, Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 10, pp. 80-113.
Keasler, M.E. (2003). “Ethical issues in judicial campaigns”, St. Mary's Law Journal, 35 (4), pp. 991-1010.
Kozinski, A. (2004). “The Real Issues of Judicial Ethics”, Hofstra Law Review, 32(4), pp. 1095-1109. Disponible en: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol32/iss4/1
Lampe, J. (2023). “The Supreme Court adopts a code of conduct”, CRS Legal Sidebar, pp. 1-7. Disponible en: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11078
Langham, D. (2020). “The History of the judicial code of ethics”, Portal de Tennessee Court of Workers Compensation Claims, pp. 1-4. Disponible en: https://wccourt.com/2020/11/17/the-history-of-the-judicial-code-of-ethics/
Lubet, S. (1998). “Judicial discipline and judicial independence”, Law and contemporary problems, 61(3), pp. 59-74. Disponible en: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol61/iss3/9/
Lubet, S. (1984-1985). “Judicial ethics and private lives”, Northwestern University Law Review, 79(5,6), pp. 983-1008. Disponible en:
https://www.nyujlpp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Steven-Lubet-Judicial-Ethics-Private-Lives.pdf
Maitland, F.W. (1919). The Constitutional history of England: A course of lectures delivered, Cambridge University Press, pp. 464-473. Administration of justice, pp. 478- 484. Government and Justice.
Malleson, K. (2011). “Appointment, discipline and removal of judges”, Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge University Press (CUP), pp. 117-133.
Malleson, K. Le Sueur A. (2008). Constitutional Futures Revisited: Britain’s Constitution to 2020, Editors: Hazell, R. Palgrave macmillan. Relations between government, parliament and judiciary, pp. 109-122.
Markey H. T. (1987). “A Judicial Need for the 80's: Schooling in Judicial Ethics”, Nebraska Law Review, 66(3), pp. 417-429. Disponible en:
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1839&context=nlr
Marotta, M. “State Supreme Court Justices and Ethics Investigations”, State Court report, (2025). Disponible en: https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/state-supreme-court-justices-and-ethics-investigations
Menand, L. (2001). The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, ISBN 0374199639, p. 435.
Mckoski, R. (2010). “Judicial Discipline and the Appearance of Impropriety: What the Public Sees Is What the Judge Gets”, Minnesota Law Review, pp. 1921-1926 y pp. 1941-1942. Disponible en: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1515&context=mlr
NCSC, (2023). “Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinions”, p.1. Disponible en: https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/94039/2023AdvisoryOpinionIndexThroughJune.pdf
O’Connor, S. D. (2003). The Majesty of the Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice, New York: Random House Publishing Group, pp. 33-80.
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la droga y el delito (2007). “Códigos de ética judicial”, Recopilación de reglas y normas de las Naciones Unidas en la esfera de la prevención del delito y la justicia penal, Nueva York, pp. 372-373.
Paterson, A. (2021). Final Judgment: The Last Law Lords and the Supreme Court, Hart Publishing, pp. 5-20.
Paterson, A. 2006, “The Legal and Ethical Duties of the Judiciary in the UK.” Journal of Law and Society, 33(3), pp. 411-434.
Phillips, N.A. (2007). “Judicial Independence”, en el Portal de Justicia de Reino Unido, p. 4. Disponible en: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/lcj_kenya_clc_120907.pdf
Polden, P. (2012). The Oxford History of the Laws of England, XI, Ch. II, Courts and Lawyers, ISBN: 9780198260301, pp. 1850 – 1880.
Posner, R.A. (1997). Law and Legal Theory in England and America, Clarendon Law Lectures, Lecture Three: Functional, Systemic Comparisons of Legal Systems, pp. 68-114.
Re, R.M. (2017). “Equal Right to the Poor”, The University of Chicago Law Review, 84, p. 1151.
Reinhardt, S. (2007). “Judicial Independence and the Crisis of Confidence in the Judiciary”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155(5), pp. 1009-1045.
Sachar D.J. (2024). “Building Public Confidence in the Judiciary through Judicial Conduct Commissions”, The Judges Journal ABA, 3(3), pp. 1-5.
Schlegel, J.H. (1980). “American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science: The Singular Case of Underhill Moore”, Buffalo Law Review, 29(195), pp. 253-322.
Shaman, J. M. (1998). “Judicial ethics”, Georgetown: Journal of legal ethics, 2, pp. 1-20.
Shetreet, S. Turenne, S. (2013). Judges on Trial: A Study of the Appointment and Accountability of the English Judiciary, Cambridge University Press, pp. 179-242. Standards of conduct on the bench, pp. 243-270. Standards of conduct in extra-judicial activities, pp. 272-350. Inmunity, discipline and removal of judges, pp. 357-378. Freedom of expression and public confidence in the judiciary.
Sedley, S. (2015). Lions Under the Throne: Essays on the History of English Public Law, Cambridge University Press, p. 5.
Supreme Court of State of Montana (2019). “Petition in Support of Revision of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct”, Bowen Greenwood, pp. 5-7. Disponible en: https://www.christianlegalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/MT-Petition-and-Memo.pdf
Stevens, R. (2005). The English Judges: Their Role in the Changing Constitution, Oxford University Press, pp. 76-88. Independence, pp. 89-95. Judges a separate branch of goverment.
United Kingdom Supreme Court (2019). “Guide to judicial conduct”, pp. 3-12. Disponible en: https://www.supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_guide_to_judicial_conduct_a456af62f8.pdf
United Kingdom Government (2024). “The Lord Chancellor’s Code of Conduct for Judicial Appointments Commissioners”, HMSO, pp.1–15. Disponible en: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/code-of-conduct-for-judicial-appointments-commissioners
United States Courts (2025). “United States Federal Courts Code of Conduct for United States Judges” Washington, 1973, pp. 1-20. Disponible en: https://www.uscourts.gov/administration-policies/judiciary-policies/ethics-policies/code-conduct-united-states-judges
Vigo, R. (2023). “Comentario al Decimosexto Dictamen, del 23 de septiembre de 2021, de la Comisión Iberoamericana de Ética Judicial sobre: La acción disciplinaria y la ética en el control del comportamiento de los jueces”, Comentarios a los dictámenes de la Comisión Iberoamericana de Ética Judicial, Escuela Nacional de la Judicatura, p. 451.
Virelli III, L. J. (2012). “Congress, the Constitution and Supreme Court Recusal”, Washington and Lee Law Review, 69, p. 1545.
Vladeck, S. (2024). “Judicial Ethics”, Harvard Law Review, 137(6), p. 1688.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Mario Velayos Álvarez
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Política de acceso abierto
Se permite el acceso libre y abierto de cualquier interesado a todos los contenidos de los números de la revista, sin costo alguno, pudiendo imprimir y trasladar todos los artículos, con la única condición de precisar la fuente y la autoría.
La revista: a) no cobra a las autorías costes por el procesamiento de los artículos ni por el envío de los mismos, b) mantiene el copyright para los autores sin restricciones, c) facilita a los autores conservar sus derechos de publicación sin limitaciones.
La Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político es una obra original del Laboratorio de Ideas y Prácticas Políticas de la Universidad Pablo de Olavide. Todos los artículos incluidos en la Revista son obra original de sus respectivas autorías. Esta Revista se ofrece libremente a la comunidad científica y académica sin coste alguno y libera los contenidos de acuerdo a la licencia "Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 CC BY-NC-SA" del proyecto Creative Commons dispuesta en la siguiente url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
Si deseas traducir o compilar alguno de los artículos aquí disponibles, por favor, ponte en contacto
