Comparison of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in the academic achievement of urban and rural students of Eghlid

Mohammad Reza Taghieh; Zohreh Tadayon; Raziyeh Taghieh

doi:10.46661/ijeri.3709

Authors

Mohammad Reza Taghieh Islamic Azad University, Branch Eghlid http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1511-6308
Zohreh Tadayon Islamic Azad University, Branch Eghlid.
Raziyeh Taghieh Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8179-1419

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.3709

Keywords:

Cognitive Knowledge, Eghlid, Metacognitive Knowledge, Statistical Society

Abstract

This research studies the cognitive and metacognitive strategies with academic success in urban and rural students; gender and place of residence that has not been the result of a definite result on their role in previous research have been gained. The present research is a correlation type and is an applied research. The aim of this study is to improve the level of learning. The target population of the high school students in Eghlid city is 269 people. A sample of 241 people was randomly selected and researched. The number of samples is specified according to the Morgan table. Pearson correlation and (T) test were used for two independent groups. The obtained result indicates that cognitive and metacognitive strategies in academic achievement, gender, and location are also effective in these strategies, so that female students are more than boys and student's Urban uses both types of strategy more than rural students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mohammad Reza Taghieh, Islamic Azad University, Branch Eghlid

Department of Persian Language and Literature, Eghlid Branch, Islamic Azad University, Eghlid, Iran

References

Saif A. A. (2002). Educational Psychology, Learning in Education, Tehran: Awareness

Flavel, J. Salovey. H (1998). Cognitive Development, Farhad Maher, Tehran, Iran: Growth.

Karami, A. (2002). Developing a tool for measuring the strategies of learning and studying and determining the relationship between these strategies and academic achievement, Ph.D., Allameh Tabatabaei University.

Ababaff, Z. (1996). Comparison of the Strategy of Learning the Strong and Weak High School Students in Secondary, 4th and 11th District High Schools in Tehran, 1974-75, Master's Thesis. Allameh Tabatabaei University.

Mayer, R, E. (1986). Psychotherapy, Translator Mohammad Taghi Farahani, Tehran: Center for Islamic Revolution Documents.

Rafts, M. Anne L. Linda, Duff, L. (1996). Learning and memorization strategies, Alinaqi Kharrazi translation, Tehran: Nashar Nay.

Brown. (1949). The psychology of cognition. Academic press

Dumbo, D. (1994). A history thinking in Rosenberg & E.Smith(eds), the psychology of human thought. Cambridge university press.

Harlow, H. (1988). Human problem-solving. Cambridge university press.

Mayer, R. Salovey, H. (1991). Children’s meta-cognation knowledge about reading. Journal of educational psychology, 70, 680-690

Pressley, M. Borkowski, j, G. Schreider, W. (1987). Cognitive Strategies: good Strategy users coordinate meta-cognation and knowledge. Angels of child Development, V4. 89-129.