An  analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model TAM in understanding Faculty’s behavioral intention to use Internet of Things IOT

Abdulaziz Alzahrani

doi:10.46661/ijeri.7461

Autores/as

Abdulaziz Alzahrani University of Hail https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8538-5058

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.7461

Palabras clave:

Modelo TAM, Autosuficiencia, Uso del Internet de las Cosas

Resumen

El estudio se enfoca en examinar la autosuficiencia de los miembros de la facultad en dos departamentos -Tecnología de la Instrucción y Ciencias de la Computación- en el uso del Internet de las Cosas (IoT) en las universidades saudíes. Para lograr el objetivo del estudio, se utilizó el Modelo de Aceptación de la Tecnología (TAM) para probar el efecto de la autosuficiencia en el uso del IoT en la educación. El TAM incluye las siguientes variables: Autosuficiencia de los miembros de la facultad (FMSE), Utilidad percibida (PU), Facilidad de uso percibida (PEOU), Actitud (AT), e Intención del comportamiento para utilizar el IoT (BI). El estudio consiste en una investigación cuantitativa, y el instrumento utilizado fue una encuesta desarrollada para medir la autosuficiencia de los miembros de la facultad. Los resultados mostraron que los miembros de la facultad que tienen más confianza en sus habilidades tecnológicas son más propensos a ver la tecnología IoT como algo beneficioso. La facilidad de uso percibida afectó tanto a la utilidad percibida como a la actitud hacia la adaptación de la IO. Sin embargo, la utilidad percibida no afectó a la actitud, y la actitud no influye en la intención de comportamiento para adoptar la tecnología IoT.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in human behavior, 63, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014

Al-Abdullatif, A. M., Al-Dokhny, A. A., & Drwish, A. M. (2022). Critical Factors Influencing Pre-Service Teachers' Use of the Internet of Things (IoT) in Classrooms. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i04.27007

Alaloni, S. (2021). Employing the Internet of Things in Saudi Universities from the Viewpoint of Faculty Members: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Education, Sohaj University, 93. https://doi.org/10.21608/edusohag.2022.212347

Elijah, O., Rahman, T. A., Orikumhi, I., Leow, C. Y., & Hindia, M. N. (2018). An overview of Internet of Things (IoT) and data analytics in agriculture: Benefits and challenges. IEEE Internet of things Journal, 5(5), 3758-3773.‏ https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2844296

Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 11(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281842180_Expanding_The_Technology_Acceptance_Model_TAM_to_Examine_Faculty_Use_of_Learning_Management_Systems_LMSs_In_Higher_Education_Institutions#fullTextFileContent

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576

Huda, I., & Yulisman, H. (2020). Mathematics, Science and Social Science teachers’ acceptance of online teacher professional development: Does internet accessibility matter?. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460,1, 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576

Hustad, E., & Arntzen, A. A. B. (2013). Facilitating teaching and learning capabilities in social learning management systems: Challenges, issues, and implications for design. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 17(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2013-0003

Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Ramayah, T., & Mutahar, A. M. (2017). Internet usage within government institutions in Yemen: An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) with internet self-efficacy and performance impact. Science International, 29(4), 737-747.‏ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318866085_Internet_Usage_within_Government_Institutions_in_Yemen_An_Extended_Technology_Acceptance_Model_TAM_with_Internet_Self-Efficacy_and_Performance_Impact#fullTextFileContent

Jaafreh, A. B. (2018). The effect factors in the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in the SME in KSA: An empirical study. International Review of Management and Business Research, 7(1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.30543/7-1(2018)-13

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.

Kim, H., Lee, S., & Shin, D. (2017). Visual Information Priming in Internet of Things: Focusing on the interface of smart refrigerator. SHS Web of Conferences 33, 1-6.‏ https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173300015

Mashal, I., & Shuhaiber, A. (2018). What makes Jordanian residents buy smart home devices? A factorial investigation using PLS-SEM. Kybernetes, 48(8), 1681-1698. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2018-0008

Mhmoud, A. J., Nafie, F. M., & Musa, B. M. (2021). Using Internet of Things Determinants to direct towards e- learning in Sudanese universities. International Journal of research in Educational Sciences, 4(4), 253-304. https://iafh.net/index.php/IJRES/article/view/262. https://doi.org/10.29009/ijres.4.4.7

NuriAbdalla, S. A. (2019). Extend of TAM model with technology anxiety and self-efficacy to accept course websites at University Canada West. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies, 3(2), 1-7. https://journals.sfu.ca/ijitls/index.php/ijitls/article/download/40/pdf

Patil, K. (2016). Retail adoption of Internet of Things: Applying TAM model. In International conference on computing, analytics and security trends (CAST), Pune, India (pp. 404-409). https://doi.org/10.1109/CAST.2016.7915003

Rad, D., Egerau, A., Roman, A., Dughi, T., Balas, E., Maier, R., Ignaut, S. & Rad, G. (2022). A Preliminary Investigation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Early Childhood Education and Care. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(1), 518-533. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.1/297

Rouf, M. A., & Akhtaruddin, M. (2018). Factors affecting the voluntary disclosure: a study by using smart PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Law and Management. 60 (6) 1498-1508. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2018-0011/full/pdf?title=factors-affecting-the-voluntary-disclosure-a-study-by-using-smart-pls-sem-approach.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2018-0011

Tsourela, M., & Nerantzaki, D. M. (2020). An internet of things (IoT) acceptance model. Assessing consumer’s behavior toward IoT products and applications. Future Internet, 12(11), 191.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12110191

Wang, S., Shi, G., Lu, M., Lin, R., & Yang, J. (2021). Determinants of active online learning in the smart learning Environment: an empirical study with PLS-SEM. Sustainability, 13(17), 9923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179923