Hypnotic Security and Democracy in the Age of the Digital Panopticon

from Hobbes to Pegasus

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.12501

Keywords:

security, techno-capitalism, surveillance, democracy, algorithms, biopolitics, securitization, data, demopedia , transparency

Abstract

This article critically analyzes the transformation of the concept of security from classical modernity to the current techno-capitalist era and its implications for democracy. Through a genealogy that begins with Hobbes’s theory of the Leviathan State and extends to the digital challenges of 2025, it shows how the notion of security has shifted from a guarantee against fear and violence to an ideological device that stabilizes the status quo of global capitalism. The theoretical framework combines ideological critique, biopolitics, securitization theory, and data surveillance studies in order to unravel the contemporary mechanisms of algorithmic social control. Current cases are examined — such as the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (2024), the reauthorization of FISA §702 in the US (2024), algorithmic changes in Twitter/X (2024), and the criminalization of the climate collective Letzte Generation in Germany — which exemplify the tension between security, technology, and civil liberties. In the conclusion, several initiatives are anticipated for further development — including demopedia, algorithmic transparency, data unions, and public platforms — aimed at redirecting security toward the democratic public interest, while anticipating possible objections and offering responses. The remainder of the conclusion underscores the urgency of restoring citizen control over digital infrastructures and outlines a future research agenda to strengthen democracy in the face of the hypnotic logic of techno-capitalist security.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkousaa, R., & Jabkhiro, J. (2023, 10 agosto). Insight: Europe cracks down after rise in "direct action" climate protests. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/after-rise-climate-direct-action-europe-cracks-down-2023-08-10/

Agamben, G. (2005). Estado de excepción (F. Costa e I. Costa, Trads.; 2.ª ed.). Adriana Hidalgo Editora.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trad.). SAGE.

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853808

Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.2307/778828

Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978 (M. Senellart, Ed.; G. Burchell, Trad.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245075

Graham, T., & Andrejevic, M. (2024). A computational analysis of potential algorithmic bias on Platform X during the 2024 US election [Preprint]. Queensland University of Technology. https://github.com/timothyjgraham/AlgorithmicBiasX

Han, B.-C. (2014). Psychopolitik: Neoliberalismus und die neuen Machttechniken. S. Fischer.

Han, B.-C. (2014). Psicopolítica: Neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder (A. Bergés, Trad.). Herder. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt7x7vj DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt7x7vj

Jones, C. (2025, 29 abril). EU's secretive "security AI" plans need critical, democratic scrutiny. Statewatch Analysis. https://www.statewatch.org/news/2025/april/eu-s-secretive-security-ai-plans-need-critical-democratic-scrutiny-says-new-report/

Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. Basic Books.

Neocleous, M. (2008). Critique of security. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748633289.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748633289.001.0001

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061

Penney, J. W. (2016). Chilling effects: Online surveillance and Wikipedia use. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 31(1), 117-182. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38SS13

Sankin, A., & Mattu, S. (2023, 2 octubre). Predictive-policing software terrible at predicting crimes. The Markup. https://themarkup.org/prediction-bias/2023/10/02/predictive-policing-software-terrible-at-predicting-crimes

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity.

Viljoen, S. (2021). A relational theory of data governance. Yale Law Journal, 131(2), 573-654. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3727562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3727562

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Seco Martínez, J. M. (2025). Hypnotic Security and Democracy in the Age of the Digital Panopticon: from Hobbes to Pegasus. International Journal of Political Thought, 20, 631–658. https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.12501

Issue

Section

Estudios Varios

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.